Active Users:286 Time:04/05/2024 03:40:32 AM
The more, the merrier. Aemon Send a noteboard - 19/04/2011 05:26:29 PM
My friend and I have the exact same LG model LCD-HD, only his is 120hz and mine is 240hz. The SOA is considerably more noticeble on his TV than mine, to the extent that I don't see it on mine but do on his.


This could be a matter of settings. It's hard to say without knowing specifics, but a lot of times those "automotion" (branding name differs) features have multiple levels corresponding to the amount of smoothing being applied. If his tv is set to use a greater degree of smoothing than yours, it may have a greater SOA, despite having a lesser refresh rate. As to whether 240 makes a difference over 120 in general. . .eh. Depends on who you ask. I've not compared them in person, so I can't make this call. I will point out, though, that the human eye can only detect so much "smoothness," and you definitely get diminishing returns as you go up the refresh rate ladder. Maybe there's another reason besides additional smoothness to set 240 above 120, but, if so, I don't know what it is.

It appears that 120hz leads to 5:5 pulldown, but from there I'm not sure why the SOA is still present as the odd framing rate is resolved. Shouldn't that clear the "judder", or is that something different than SOA?


From everything I've read, these are two different issues. If I understand DomA correctly, he seems to be saying that isn't so. I don't believe he's right on that, but he does seem to be something of an expert, so you can decide who to believe. :P I tried to provide at least one link to back up what I was saying, but the site I linked to was hardly the authority on such matters, so. . .*shrugs* In any case, I'll explain the issue as I understand it.

1) Soap Opera Effect: everything looks "too smooth." This is caused by the TV's circuitry algorithmically creating intermediate frames, instead of displaying the same frame many times in a row.

2) Judder: This is caused by a tv running at a frame rate that is not a multiple of the source input. Typically, you will find this when watching 24fps input (most blu-rays) on a 60hz tv (most low-end televisions). The following link will explain the technical side of the problem better than I can: link.

To prevent judder when watching 24p source material, you need a tv capable of refreshing at a multiple of 24. This is common for LCDs, which often have 120 or 240hz modes. These tvs generally have a "cinema" mode (again, it's called a lot of different things) that sets the tv to use its higher refresh rate, WITHOUT using the automotion processing that causes the SOA. In other words, it displays one frame five times, followed by the next at five times, etc. Rather than displaying one frame, then displaying four algorithmically generated intermediate frames, then the next "real" frame, etc.

With my 240hz, the math says that's a 10:10 pulldown. Is that correct? Could that alone be reason for why I don't see the SOA on my TV compared to his? I will admit that I'm not sure of the status of Truemotion for either TV atm. Is there something about 120hz which doesn't clear the SOA but 240hz would?


I'm still betting it's a matter of settings. You probably have your automotion processing set lower than he does. As I understand it, the SOA is basically just the picture being "too smooth," and (in theory) a 240hz tv should be capable of more smoothness than a 120hz tv. Whether that's noticeable in practice is up for debate.

Either way, djwilons post seems vastly exaggerated regarding the ineffectiveness of LCD-HD's. My TV picture is beautiful, everyone comments on it's awesomeness, blu-rays (especially Avatar) are a dream to see, and standard DVD's even shine like never before. Gaming of course rocks. :|


LCD HDTVs have a great picture, no doubt about that. The soap opera effect of automotion processing bothers some people, but other people love it. For those who don't, just turning it off should work fine. I have no idea what your tv is set to use, but I'd say you either don't have a lot of processing enabled, or else you've learned to like the SOA. :P Either one is perfectly fine, and I'm sure you've got a great tv.
This message last edited by Aemon on 19/04/2011 at 05:27:06 PM
Reply to message
Game of Thrones - Episode 1: Official discussion thread - 17/04/2011 11:04:49 AM 3004 Views
i'm going to start off with.... - 17/04/2011 04:08:12 PM 1297 Views
HOLY CRAP - 18/04/2011 03:06:55 AM 1318 Views
No, but Jaime and Tyrion have a VERY strong sibling resemblance. - 18/04/2011 06:29:00 AM 975 Views
Joff's lips were just not pouty enough I thought, still I can't stand the sight of him, so good job *NM* - 18/04/2011 07:13:22 AM 415 Views
I couldn't stand him at first sight - 19/04/2011 07:34:33 PM 845 Views
I also approve of the casting. Other impressions: - 18/04/2011 06:33:44 AM 1094 Views
Dany's wedding night did not end with a smile.... - 18/04/2011 07:08:38 AM 1103 Views
Hmm. - 18/04/2011 07:47:44 AM 1007 Views
I think you're pretty close to remembering correctly - 19/04/2011 02:28:06 AM 965 Views
Meh, I didn't really mind that scene. - 19/04/2011 03:38:34 AM 825 Views
I see it differently. - 19/04/2011 05:11:25 AM 872 Views
Re: I see it differently. - 19/04/2011 02:16:42 PM 780 Views
Re: I also approve of the casting. Other impressions: - 18/04/2011 08:09:05 AM 956 Views
I really enjoyed it, but one thing that was distracting me... - 18/04/2011 08:15:54 AM 1159 Views
So you were definitly watching it on a LCD or LED tv with 120hrtz or greater.....they are poopy - 18/04/2011 08:52:29 AM 948 Views
so, will I have this problem watching the Hobbit next year? - 18/04/2011 07:17:58 PM 776 Views
Hard to say. - 18/04/2011 09:44:13 PM 934 Views
Ouch.... - 18/04/2011 09:59:28 PM 898 Views
I'm not an expert by any means, but I think you have that wrong. - 19/04/2011 03:22:46 AM 1084 Views
Re: I'm not an expert by any means, but I think you have that wrong. - 19/04/2011 02:29:30 PM 836 Views
As I said, you sound like you know what you're talking about. - 19/04/2011 03:53:34 PM 964 Views
I've gotta butt in - 19/04/2011 04:46:28 PM 806 Views
The more, the merrier. - 19/04/2011 05:26:29 PM 953 Views
Poopy was kinda strong language. It is a matter of taste and Aemon is my new favorite. - 19/04/2011 06:25:15 PM 875 Views
INFERIASMA! - 19/04/2011 07:25:45 PM 629 Views
That's definitely the case. They're both good. *NM* - 19/04/2011 07:27:42 PM 466 Views
Gonna look into the setting tonight - 19/04/2011 07:22:19 PM 878 Views
Re: As I said, you sound like you know what you're talking about. - 20/04/2011 12:24:25 AM 808 Views
this whole discussion has gone way over my head - 20/04/2011 12:53:06 AM 772 Views
Yeah, I think we were just getting confused with some terms. - 20/04/2011 08:04:47 AM 798 Views
I def agree with you about Dany's wedding night. *NM* - 22/04/2011 04:45:10 AM 473 Views
One question that can be seen in the preview - 18/04/2011 06:55:16 AM 971 Views
I wondered at this too - 18/04/2011 07:26:15 PM 809 Views
Re: I wondered at this too - 18/04/2011 08:21:07 PM 845 Views
It appears doggy-style is the preferred method of copulation so far. *NM* - 18/04/2011 08:11:45 AM 481 Views
the last couple we saw doing it that way - 18/04/2011 08:34:33 AM 1293 Views
Is it me - 18/04/2011 12:48:48 PM 986 Views
Yes, it was definitely a different scenery than the rest of Winterfell. - 19/04/2011 04:31:00 AM 902 Views
Yeah, she was walking through the inner yard and then arrived there - 19/04/2011 08:35:54 AM 1025 Views
A good start! - 18/04/2011 02:08:45 PM 1024 Views
you're not entirely wrong - 19/04/2011 02:40:45 AM 902 Views
It was as epic as I had hoped - 18/04/2011 09:05:28 PM 730 Views
ended right where I expected - 19/04/2011 02:52:05 AM 757 Views
Well I think it was as good as it could have been. - 19/04/2011 03:03:27 AM 1076 Views
Interesting that you comment on the looks, because I felt the same. - 19/04/2011 03:50:49 AM 1047 Views
I agree - 19/04/2011 08:12:18 AM 842 Views
Re: I agree - 19/04/2011 02:23:18 PM 925 Views
Demonstrating that beauty is subjective, I strongly disagree - 23/04/2011 09:20:08 PM 1003 Views
It was certainly good, but some disappointment too - 19/04/2011 07:53:30 AM 1066 Views
That was very good, but... - 19/04/2011 08:17:02 AM 984 Views
Actually, I have never read the books..... - 19/04/2011 05:07:29 PM 904 Views
Good to know *NM* - 19/04/2011 05:32:56 PM 434 Views
A friend.... - 19/04/2011 07:32:05 PM 850 Views
so having watched it - 19/04/2011 09:13:44 AM 699 Views
A couple of early impressions... - 19/04/2011 07:55:04 PM 1131 Views
nah, the break out performance on this show is going to be - 20/04/2011 01:00:50 AM 902 Views
yup, I already love her character. *NM* - 20/04/2011 03:24:46 AM 496 Views
Entirely possible - 20/04/2011 04:17:28 PM 776 Views
If there is one thing I wanna see next year... - 21/04/2011 10:13:07 AM 876 Views
as someone who has never read the books I thought it was OK - 22/04/2011 04:59:34 PM 792 Views
My take - 23/04/2011 06:50:47 PM 800 Views

Reply to Message