Active Users:570 Time:06/06/2026 12:53:18 PM
Which were which? *NM* beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 28/02/2012 02:46:40 PM
And is horribly mistaken a couple of times, too.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
What if Episode 1 was good? - 28/02/2012 05:11:40 AM 1342 Views
thank you. this is awesome. *NM* - 28/02/2012 05:47:36 AM 437 Views
He has some good points - 28/02/2012 11:32:49 AM 827 Views
Which were which? *NM* - 28/02/2012 02:46:40 PM 346 Views
Talking people are annoying, especially when their first idea is stupid - 28/02/2012 01:51:50 PM 837 Views
Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 02:55:46 PM 964 Views
Re: Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 04:22:16 PM 1049 Views
This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 06:54:00 PM 815 Views
Re: This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 11:27:02 PM 898 Views
Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 28/02/2012 07:42:43 PM 724 Views
Qui-Gon is the protagonist if you absolutely need one (though I don't know why you do) - 28/02/2012 10:59:23 PM 812 Views
Eh. It wasn't much of an "ensemble," either - 29/02/2012 06:23:23 PM 868 Views
You don't really need character development either - 29/02/2012 07:56:09 PM 818 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 12:16:51 AM 798 Views
Well said - 29/02/2012 08:39:36 AM 843 Views
Re: Well said - 02/03/2012 04:51:49 PM 849 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 06:33:07 PM 732 Views
Actually, I didn't get that far. The guy annoyed me so much I shut it off after the last point - 28/02/2012 06:45:43 PM 817 Views
Hah, I do! - 28/02/2012 07:55:52 PM 710 Views
Now I want Facebook posts for WoT - 29/02/2012 07:47:31 PM 897 Views
I just hate beets - 01/03/2012 05:18:41 PM 761 Views
Who here thinks they could make a better Episode I ? - 06/03/2012 06:43:58 PM 715 Views
Of course they'd all raise their hands - 07/03/2012 12:34:30 PM 755 Views
The point was that there's nothing special about this guy. - 08/03/2012 01:02:32 AM 810 Views

Reply to Message