Active Users:214 Time:06/05/2024 03:38:08 PM
Which were which? *NM* beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 28/02/2012 02:46:40 PM
And is horribly mistaken a couple of times, too.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
What if Episode 1 was good? - 28/02/2012 05:11:40 AM 993 Views
thank you. this is awesome. *NM* - 28/02/2012 05:47:36 AM 292 Views
He has some good points - 28/02/2012 11:32:49 AM 512 Views
Which were which? *NM* - 28/02/2012 02:46:40 PM 204 Views
Talking people are annoying, especially when their first idea is stupid - 28/02/2012 01:51:50 PM 525 Views
Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 02:55:46 PM 632 Views
Re: Errrr you're not really addressing the video - 28/02/2012 04:22:16 PM 664 Views
This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 06:54:00 PM 470 Views
Re: This. Very much. - 28/02/2012 11:27:02 PM 545 Views
Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 28/02/2012 07:42:43 PM 395 Views
Qui-Gon is the protagonist if you absolutely need one (though I don't know why you do) - 28/02/2012 10:59:23 PM 448 Views
Eh. It wasn't much of an "ensemble," either - 29/02/2012 06:23:23 PM 518 Views
You don't really need character development either - 29/02/2012 07:56:09 PM 513 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 12:16:51 AM 456 Views
Well said - 29/02/2012 08:39:36 AM 507 Views
Re: Well said - 02/03/2012 04:51:49 PM 490 Views
Re: Because 7-10 year olds are really into trade regulation? - 29/02/2012 06:33:07 PM 400 Views
Actually, I didn't get that far. The guy annoyed me so much I shut it off after the last point - 28/02/2012 06:45:43 PM 493 Views
Hah, I do! - 28/02/2012 07:55:52 PM 393 Views
Now I want Facebook posts for WoT - 29/02/2012 07:47:31 PM 562 Views
I just hate beets - 01/03/2012 05:18:41 PM 428 Views
Who here thinks they could make a better Episode I ? - 06/03/2012 06:43:58 PM 397 Views
Of course they'd all raise their hands - 07/03/2012 12:34:30 PM 433 Views
The point was that there's nothing special about this guy. - 08/03/2012 01:02:32 AM 463 Views

Reply to Message