Mostly because the hype is just too big and the film/book certainly is not the second coming of Christ. However, it was a really decent piece of entertainment that missed out on a few opportunities to comment on real issues though.
That being said, I've never seen BR, so I can't comment beyond that. But I think they do address very different audiences and that makes the whole idea of a similar premise not all that tragic, as far as I am concerned.
That being said, I've never seen BR, so I can't comment beyond that. But I think they do address very different audiences and that makes the whole idea of a similar premise not all that tragic, as far as I am concerned.
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale
- 23/04/2012 02:11:03 AM
1296 Views
I don't wanna defend HG all that much...
- 23/04/2012 08:44:00 AM
990 Views
What issues exactly did Hunger Games not address that it should have?
- 23/04/2012 04:46:34 PM
967 Views
Re: What issues exactly did Hunger Games not address that it should have?
- 24/04/2012 05:41:28 AM
911 Views
I did not necessarily take the strict dichotomy of poor = good and rich = bad from the film...
- 24/04/2012 08:22:59 AM
1129 Views
That premise is the equivalent of public domain - it's so unoriginal you can't call plagiarism
- 23/04/2012 03:40:26 PM
1152 Views
In this case, the suggestion is justified (at least with the books)
- 23/04/2012 06:03:08 PM
1005 Views
Superiority is not evidence of plagiarism (and arguably more evident of the opposite)
- 23/04/2012 07:15:35 PM
905 Views
indeed..think of the suits that could run rampant throughout sci-fi/fantasy if that was the case!
*NM*
- 23/04/2012 09:23:37 PM
539 Views
*NM*
- 23/04/2012 09:23:37 PM
539 Views
Is it really fair to compare the two books of BR to the first book of THG alone?
- 23/04/2012 09:22:18 PM
996 Views
There's only one BATTLE ROYALE novel.
- 23/04/2012 10:18:27 PM
919 Views
AH okay. I couldn't quite understand what you were saying. Thank you for clarifying. *NM*
- 23/04/2012 10:47:48 PM
526 Views

*NM*