I agree with Jens in that the films were made with different audiences in mind. The only basis for comparison is the "throw everyone together and only one survives" plot development which is an oldie but a goodie.
You are absolutely not the target audience for THG, neither am I for that matter though I did enjoy it thoroughly.
You are absolutely not the target audience for THG, neither am I for that matter though I did enjoy it thoroughly.
One should forgive one's enemies, but not before they are hanged. -- Henrich Heine
Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale
- 23/04/2012 02:11:03 AM
1145 Views
I don't wanna defend HG all that much...
- 23/04/2012 08:44:00 AM
830 Views
What issues exactly did Hunger Games not address that it should have?
- 23/04/2012 04:46:34 PM
821 Views
Re: What issues exactly did Hunger Games not address that it should have?
- 24/04/2012 05:41:28 AM
763 Views
I did not necessarily take the strict dichotomy of poor = good and rich = bad from the film...
- 24/04/2012 08:22:59 AM
970 Views
That premise is the equivalent of public domain - it's so unoriginal you can't call plagiarism
- 23/04/2012 03:40:26 PM
995 Views
*NM*
In this case, the suggestion is justified (at least with the books)
- 23/04/2012 06:03:08 PM
857 Views
Superiority is not evidence of plagiarism (and arguably more evident of the opposite)
- 23/04/2012 07:15:35 PM
746 Views
indeed..think of the suits that could run rampant throughout sci-fi/fantasy if that was the case! 
*NM*
- 23/04/2012 09:23:37 PM
431 Views
*NM*
- 23/04/2012 09:23:37 PM
431 Views
Is it really fair to compare the two books of BR to the first book of THG alone?
- 23/04/2012 09:22:18 PM
836 Views
There's only one BATTLE ROYALE novel.
- 23/04/2012 10:18:27 PM
754 Views
AH okay. I couldn't quite understand what you were saying. Thank you for clarifying. *NM*
- 23/04/2012 10:47:48 PM
418 Views
Me likey both
- 23/04/2012 09:33:16 PM
807 Views