Active Users:732 Time:08/01/2026 09:45:16 AM
Re: Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 23/04/2012 11:22:34 PM

The US movie is a vomitous melodrama where the main character consistently acts in an idealized manner, against a backdrop of cheap propaganda clichés (institutionalized exploitation of proud and honest poor rural hicks by evil, rich, egotistical and degenerate city-dwellers), something bound to excite viewers with an active victimization complex. It shares aspects of an equally bad movie, which was called, I believe, In Time and had Justin Timberlake in the main role, mainly the economic exploitation line. The coal miners' union probably loved this steaming pile of horseshit.


Who are you going to market your movie to, when the success of said film is judged on individual ticket sales? The 99% or the 1%? ;)
Reply to message
Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale - 23/04/2012 02:11:03 AM 1338 Views
I don't wanna defend HG all that much... - 23/04/2012 08:44:00 AM 1032 Views
This - 23/04/2012 03:41:17 PM 1033 Views
Agree with all of this as well. *NM* - 23/04/2012 10:07:21 PM 483 Views
That premise is the equivalent of public domain - it's so unoriginal you can't call plagiarism - 23/04/2012 03:40:26 PM 1193 Views
You're such a fucking idiot. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:22:47 PM 532 Views
*NM* - 23/04/2012 05:14:55 PM 470 Views
Me likey both - 23/04/2012 09:33:16 PM 1004 Views
Re: Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale - 23/04/2012 11:22:34 PM 952 Views
I posit: THG raised awareness of Battle Royale - 25/04/2012 08:22:16 PM 1053 Views
My only comment is: - 27/04/2012 10:10:49 AM 1577 Views
i don't understand this hunger games stuff - 01/05/2012 10:22:04 PM 1185 Views

Reply to Message