Active Users:366 Time:09/07/2025 06:34:06 PM
Damn connection. Double post. *NM* j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 04/05/2012 11:10:29 PM
We're not after some sort of archival efficiency, here, where we attempt to preserve the legend of Spiderman without expending unnecessary resources. :P We're just getting a new movie with a familiar setting and character list, that's all. And we're getting it a full five years after the last Spiderman movie. I don't know about you, but I'm perfectly happy to watch Spiderman zoom around New York every five years or so, and I don't see what's so dumb about that.

If it were a continuation of the Spider-Man myths it would be great. It's not though. It's retelling a story that was told in the not too distant past. If an origin story is what's being told then the first movie of Rami's trilogy was great at that. Just tell a different story building on that.
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
New Amazing Spider-Man trailer - 04/05/2012 01:52:49 AM 746 Views
Dammit. - 04/05/2012 02:42:49 AM 449 Views
DAYUM! I just shot webbing all over my computer screen. *NM* - 04/05/2012 06:40:03 AM 227 Views
I hope the film offers more fun than angst - 04/05/2012 11:35:37 AM 439 Views
Loved the knife bit - 04/05/2012 04:45:35 PM 402 Views
What is the point of this movie/reboot? - 04/05/2012 04:55:29 PM 441 Views
The. . .the point? People like to watch Spiderman. That is the point. - 04/05/2012 08:03:20 PM 555 Views
There's nothing dumb about watching Spider-Man zoom around the city. - 04/05/2012 11:04:58 PM 434 Views
There's nothing dumb about watching Spider-Man zoom around the city. - 04/05/2012 11:06:05 PM 528 Views
Damn connection. Double post. *NM* - 04/05/2012 11:10:29 PM 236 Views
Triple post. Ouch. - 04/05/2012 11:06:38 PM 576 Views
+1. Absolutely idiotic. I'm not going. *NM* - 04/05/2012 10:05:24 PM 185 Views
It's far too soon - 04/05/2012 07:28:58 PM 453 Views
It kinda looks like it could be really good - 04/05/2012 11:31:44 PM 571 Views

Reply to Message