Active Users:462 Time:04/05/2025 01:33:03 AM
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc Cannoli Send a noteboard - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM

I think that the problem here is that you see a bow/arrow and dismiss him as nothing more than the pair of arms that uses it. I thought he worked into the story very well, and I never felt that he was anything other than a bad ass human helping out his team. I loved when they put him up for recon, basically, and he advised Stark on the banking, for example.


I think the character is pretty cool, and his accomplishments and attributes are impressive, ESPECIALLY considering that he was doing all this stuff with only a bow and arrows. My point is not that I can't see the agent for the bow and arrows, it is all about how much MORE impressive that agent would be with a frigging GUN. Why carry the bow, when it can't do anything that a gun could also do, more easily and efficiently. Maybe he wouldn't let a (selectively)skinny chick beat him in a hand-to-hand fight, if he had a spare arm to fend her off with, instead of needing both of them to shoot. Maybe he could put those extraordinary reflexes and aim to use with a gun in each hand, to kill two foes at once, rather than use both arms to kill one guy at a time.

Think how much more effective he would be if he had dedicated all those hours he spent on archery. Since this is a WoT fan community, you should recall the various times in the series where Jordan points out the long period of time required to learn archery, and why point-and-shoot weapons like crossbows [or guns] are preferable if they can increase their rates of fire. Mat Cauthon and co would be facepalming at the idea of a man using arrows when he has access to tiny little dragons that can shoot faster than a man can count.

If they have guns that can shoot the fire of an ass-cheek-norsegod-robot, they could rig up a multipurpose gun that could do all the things his trick quiver could do, WITHOUT being a huge thing he has to carry that hurts when he lands on his back.

And the heroism is undercut if the threat is mild enough to allow Hawkeye the luxury of using a second-class weapon. The point is they are supposed to be going all out and pulling out all the stops, hence the justification for loosing the rage beast. Yet, there's Hawkeye, farting around with a less effective weapon, because it looks more badass. This is not Ankh-Morpork they are defending, where the chances of shooting down a monstrous flying threat to the city actually improve with all the handicaps you pile on your marksman!
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1454 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 907 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 1001 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 760 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 691 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 663 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 699 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 677 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 711 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 722 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 708 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 619 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 705 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 730 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 744 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 706 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 771 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 767 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 721 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 658 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 665 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 672 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 653 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 397 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 311 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 687 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 883 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 676 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 617 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 740 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 722 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 781 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 874 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 679 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 642 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 689 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 783 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 730 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 338 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 689 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 667 Views

Reply to Message