Active Users:930 Time:17/09/2026 07:46:53 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM
If you have always wanted to be able to dunk a basketball, but figured that you were just to fat and out of shape to ever do so, and one day you saw a 450 lb midget do it; thus, resutling in you rethinking your previously conceived limitations, were you influenced? No, you were not. "Insipred" could possibly be used, but not influenced.
Reply to message
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time? Dannymac - 10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM 1385 Views
ont forget THX and Skywalker Sound. *NM* MightyYT - 10/10/2012 04:02:18 AM 542 Views
Absolutely, right. ironclad - 10/10/2012 08:11:54 AM 1047 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM* beetnemesis - 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM 475 Views
Hardly, he's not even one... *NM* DomA - 12/10/2012 01:21:18 AM 436 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs Roland00 - 10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM 970 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation. Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM 923 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola Cannoli - 10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM 1135 Views
My point is that his greatest contribution is horrifically overlooked. Dannymac - 11/10/2012 06:14:53 AM 955 Views
Hell has frozen over imlad - 11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM 995 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me. Cannoli - 12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM 1048 Views
well, I always point it out when it happens to me imlad - 12/10/2012 08:24:44 PM 998 Views
acting does matter for opera though ... The_Muted_Grimaud - 23/10/2012 07:57:56 AM 1218 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title DomA - 12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM 999 Views
I'm not sure the OP was saying he was the most influential director imlad - 12/10/2012 08:34:02 PM 981 Views
Pretty sure I said film-maker. (Checks the Subject line.) Yep, I did. *NM* Dannymac - 15/10/2012 05:28:50 AM 512 Views
That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:31:26 PM 466 Views
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. DomA - 19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM 986 Views
this is not in response to DomA's comment, but imlad - 19/10/2012 08:31:23 PM 967 Views
I've seen parts of that. It's a good one. *NM* ironclad - 22/10/2012 08:49:47 AM 441 Views
I agree 100%. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:29:40 PM 451 Views
Short answer, no. HyogaRott - 15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM 1012 Views
So who beats him out? Dannymac - 16/10/2012 02:23:19 AM 947 Views
Thats the point, he didn't actually change anything; he demanded that others change things. HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:35:03 PM 1077 Views
You have a strange definition of influence. Nate - 16/10/2012 09:55:59 PM 967 Views
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive. HyogaRott - 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM 1007 Views
Spielburg, Howard, Coppola, Tarrentino... There is a long list, even only among the modern filmakers *NM* HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:39:28 PM 504 Views
Maybe, no, no, and no. Lucas had a much bigger impact that any of the film-makers ..... Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:40:41 AM 927 Views
Well, as a director he doesn't usually even warrant mention Tom - 18/10/2012 10:27:24 PM 1154 Views
Absolutely not. Tom - 18/10/2012 10:19:20 PM 1100 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes