Active Users:422 Time:18/06/2025 11:07:13 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM
If you have always wanted to be able to dunk a basketball, but figured that you were just to fat and out of shape to ever do so, and one day you saw a 450 lb midget do it; thus, resutling in you rethinking your previously conceived limitations, were you influenced? No, you were not. "Insipred" could possibly be used, but not influenced.
Reply to message
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time? Dannymac - 10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM 1120 Views
ont forget THX and Skywalker Sound. *NM* MightyYT - 10/10/2012 04:02:18 AM 433 Views
Absolutely, right. ironclad - 10/10/2012 08:11:54 AM 829 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM* beetnemesis - 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM 372 Views
Hardly, he's not even one... *NM* DomA - 12/10/2012 01:21:18 AM 334 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs Roland00 - 10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM 768 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation. Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM 682 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola Cannoli - 10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM 869 Views
My point is that his greatest contribution is horrifically overlooked. Dannymac - 11/10/2012 06:14:53 AM 731 Views
Hell has frozen over imlad - 11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM 758 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me. Cannoli - 12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM 805 Views
well, I always point it out when it happens to me imlad - 12/10/2012 08:24:44 PM 769 Views
acting does matter for opera though ... The_Muted_Grimaud - 23/10/2012 07:57:56 AM 962 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title DomA - 12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM 770 Views
I'm not sure the OP was saying he was the most influential director imlad - 12/10/2012 08:34:02 PM 762 Views
Pretty sure I said film-maker. (Checks the Subject line.) Yep, I did. *NM* Dannymac - 15/10/2012 05:28:50 AM 386 Views
That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:31:26 PM 336 Views
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. DomA - 19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM 749 Views
this is not in response to DomA's comment, but imlad - 19/10/2012 08:31:23 PM 765 Views
I've seen parts of that. It's a good one. *NM* ironclad - 22/10/2012 08:49:47 AM 331 Views
I agree 100%. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:29:40 PM 344 Views
Short answer, no. HyogaRott - 15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM 785 Views
So who beats him out? Dannymac - 16/10/2012 02:23:19 AM 724 Views
Thats the point, he didn't actually change anything; he demanded that others change things. HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:35:03 PM 858 Views
You have a strange definition of influence. Nate - 16/10/2012 09:55:59 PM 758 Views
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive. HyogaRott - 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM 796 Views
Spielburg, Howard, Coppola, Tarrentino... There is a long list, even only among the modern filmakers *NM* HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:39:28 PM 370 Views
Maybe, no, no, and no. Lucas had a much bigger impact that any of the film-makers ..... Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:40:41 AM 715 Views
Well, as a director he doesn't usually even warrant mention Tom - 18/10/2012 10:27:24 PM 949 Views
Absolutely not. Tom - 18/10/2012 10:19:20 PM 877 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes