Active Users:158 Time:17/05/2024 09:41:31 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Maybe, no, no, and no. Lucas had a much bigger impact that any of the film-makers ..... Anonymous2000 Send a noteboard - 18/10/2012 04:40:41 AM
.....you mentioned. And even with Spielberg, he is great, but I don't think he "changed" the industry like GL did.
Reply to message
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time? Dannymac - 10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM 977 Views
ont forget THX and Skywalker Sound. *NM* MightyYT - 10/10/2012 04:02:18 AM 309 Views
Absolutely, right. ironclad - 10/10/2012 08:11:54 AM 681 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM* beetnemesis - 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM 310 Views
Hardly, he's not even one... *NM* DomA - 12/10/2012 01:21:18 AM 276 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs Roland00 - 10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM 600 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation. Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM 533 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola Cannoli - 10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM 725 Views
My point is that his greatest contribution is horrifically overlooked. Dannymac - 11/10/2012 06:14:53 AM 585 Views
Hell has frozen over imlad - 11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM 605 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me. Cannoli - 12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM 646 Views
well, I always point it out when it happens to me imlad - 12/10/2012 08:24:44 PM 626 Views
acting does matter for opera though ... The_Muted_Grimaud - 23/10/2012 07:57:56 AM 787 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title DomA - 12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM 571 Views
I'm not sure the OP was saying he was the most influential director imlad - 12/10/2012 08:34:02 PM 604 Views
Pretty sure I said film-maker. (Checks the Subject line.) Yep, I did. *NM* Dannymac - 15/10/2012 05:28:50 AM 306 Views
That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:31:26 PM 272 Views
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. DomA - 19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM 587 Views
this is not in response to DomA's comment, but imlad - 19/10/2012 08:31:23 PM 613 Views
I've seen parts of that. It's a good one. *NM* ironclad - 22/10/2012 08:49:47 AM 272 Views
I agree 100%. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:29:40 PM 279 Views
Short answer, no. HyogaRott - 15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM 666 Views
So who beats him out? Dannymac - 16/10/2012 02:23:19 AM 554 Views
Thats the point, he didn't actually change anything; he demanded that others change things. HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:35:03 PM 724 Views
You have a strange definition of influence. Nate - 16/10/2012 09:55:59 PM 608 Views
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive. HyogaRott - 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM 645 Views
Spielburg, Howard, Coppola, Tarrentino... There is a long list, even only among the modern filmakers *NM* HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:39:28 PM 308 Views
Maybe, no, no, and no. Lucas had a much bigger impact that any of the film-makers ..... Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:40:41 AM 563 Views
Well, as a director he doesn't usually even warrant mention Tom - 18/10/2012 10:27:24 PM 774 Views
Absolutely not. Tom - 18/10/2012 10:19:20 PM 727 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes