There was no 48 FPS version playing anywhere near me, so I can't comment on the "soap opera" look some people were talking about before hand. I am curious to hear what actual viewers have to say about this. The "regular" 3D was blurry during some pans, as so often, but overall definitely among the better ones since Avatar. Especially some of the long shots were beautifully deep and gorgeous to look at.
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
The Hobbit - Discussion thread and first thoughts
- 13/12/2012 12:21:52 AM
2772 Views
As for the 3D...
- 13/12/2012 04:18:43 PM
1515 Views
I wouldn't call it a rash - more like chafing.
- 14/12/2012 04:36:42 PM
1402 Views
I liked it. There are some nitpicks, but overall it is enjoyable
- 14/12/2012 04:50:28 PM
1319 Views
I think two words have killed this movie for me: "orc nemesis"
- 15/12/2012 02:00:33 AM
1384 Views
To be fair, it's an orc nemesis from the books.
- 15/12/2012 07:23:16 PM
1423 Views
Wait are we talking about Azog here?
- 16/12/2012 01:08:11 AM
1388 Views
Looks like it.
- 16/12/2012 12:19:19 PM
1294 Views
There was not an orc nemesis in the books
- 16/12/2012 01:55:59 PM
1254 Views
There actually was in Tolkein's mind, it is just contained in a different book. *NM*
- 28/12/2012 02:37:13 PM
634 Views
If you haven't seen it, you really can't judge. It's not a big deal
- 09/01/2013 04:13:48 AM
1291 Views
I hated it, but I know I will be in the minority.
- 28/12/2012 02:45:26 PM
1334 Views
I think any of those changes need to be viewed with the question, "Did it make a better movie?"
- 09/01/2013 04:25:32 AM
1310 Views
Radagast? Bunny Sledge? Archrival Azog? The whole goblin cavern scene? It's a massacre alright. *NM*
- 11/01/2013 03:07:55 PM
752 Views
i actually liked the stone giant fight, that was part of the book which i appreciated in the film
- 08/01/2013 09:47:18 PM
1385 Views


