Active Users:177 Time:18/05/2024 11:38:19 PM
It is self-defeating. everynametaken Send a noteboard - 26/10/2009 06:48:18 AM
The problem is multi-facted. It is not just about advertising dollars versus subscription fees. It contains a psychological element that their models cannot take into account.

In the short term they may make more in subscriptions fees but in the long term they will not only run off a large segment of their current viewers back to piracy but they will ultimately undermine their ability to get new membership because pirating will simply be cheaper and just as convenient.

Using the advertising model they currently use allows for people to view TV shows and movies they want to view for, in essence free, while also saving them the time of downloading. But, once people see that what was once free will now cost them something more than the time spent watching the commercials they will simply revert back to what they did before.

History tells us the subscription method does not work and that people do exactly as I have just said. Just ask Napster or Kazaa or the myriad of others who have tried subscription services and failed miserably at it.

Subscription services grow stagnant after initial interest because there are just too many ways to get the stuff for free. If you would like a perfect example I will give you one. I do not download Family Guy or Dollhouse because I can watch them at Hulu for free. I am willing to watch the little commercials because they aren't constant, they are fairly well spaced out and it is simply more convenient to use Hulu then downloading them which depending on seeds, peers, etc. can take some time (the more popular shows are typically faster to download).

Subscription service? Nope, no thanks. I'll simply get a copy from a friend or download it myself (even if it is slow I can always let it go in the background while I do other stuff). But what about new members like my mother or brother? They might hear about Hulu, go to the site and see it is a subscription service. Then, when they ask me what I know about it I will simply give them the copy that I obtained through any one of multiple ways.

So, now instead of having one person (me) watching the advertising for sure they will also lose my brother and my mother whom I would have otherwise just told to watch Hulu. Over time who long will it be before they lose people who otherwise would have stayed and their new subscription rate grows stagnant. History says they'll be on the verge of going under within a few years of their subscription service.

Hulu needs people, people do not need Hulu.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Soon, you'll have to pay for Hulu - 26/10/2009 04:39:59 AM 1059 Views
I'm getting a little tired of everyone going on about how stupid companies are. - 26/10/2009 06:04:30 AM 538 Views
It is self-defeating. - 26/10/2009 06:48:18 AM 411 Views
Subscription services work just fine - 26/10/2009 07:32:15 AM 512 Views
I think the point was... - 26/10/2009 04:51:21 PM 370 Views
Yes, just ask Napster or Kazaa, etc. *NM* - 26/10/2009 06:04:16 PM 148 Views
Because clearly... - 26/10/2009 07:52:44 PM 364 Views
It is a flawed business model when you start from scratch. - 26/10/2009 11:20:48 PM 350 Views
Not at all my point. - 26/10/2009 01:59:28 PM 493 Views
Fair enough. Although, I've worked at plenty of corporations and... - 26/10/2009 06:02:11 PM 397 Views
If they do that, I'm gone. - 26/10/2009 01:14:59 PM 335 Views
I'm having trouble finding the anger for this. - 26/10/2009 07:30:11 PM 365 Views
One thing to note... - 26/10/2009 07:55:41 PM 372 Views
heh - 26/10/2009 07:59:14 PM 477 Views
I'm with you on that - 26/10/2009 08:17:25 PM 404 Views
I don't understand why people use Hulu or downloads - 26/10/2009 10:06:25 PM 496 Views
I'll help you out. - 27/10/2009 12:32:05 AM 444 Views
Why I like Hulu. - 29/10/2009 11:34:03 PM 542 Views

Reply to Message