Active Users:697 Time:13/03/2026 02:17:20 AM
Re Kate and Aaron Mark Send a noteboard - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM
When they were off trying to track Sawyer didn't Kate tell Jin about Aaron when Jin asked her why she came back to the Island? She defiantly said something about wanting to find Claire.
Once known as Hochopepa

You cannot kill a vampire with an MDF stake; werewolves can't fly; zombies do not run. - Simon Pegg
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 905 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 567 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 554 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 637 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 650 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 553 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 586 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 610 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 568 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 210 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 621 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 545 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 505 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 559 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 594 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 530 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 528 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 530 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 528 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 519 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 544 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 607 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 591 Views

Reply to Message