Active Users:1551 Time:02/05/2026 01:37:01 AM
Re Kate and Aaron Mark Send a noteboard - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM
When they were off trying to track Sawyer didn't Kate tell Jin about Aaron when Jin asked her why she came back to the Island? She defiantly said something about wanting to find Claire.
Once known as Hochopepa

You cannot kill a vampire with an MDF stake; werewolves can't fly; zombies do not run. - Simon Pegg
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 925 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 590 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 579 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 660 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 677 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 582 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 612 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 636 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 588 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 220 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 645 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 574 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 527 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 585 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 622 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 552 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 551 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 561 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 552 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 558 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 570 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 624 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 618 Views

Reply to Message