Active Users:1185 Time:03/08/2026 07:19:22 AM
Re: You know... TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM
Then again, I like that the movie offers the interpretation of him being a replicant but doesn't flat out say it, so it's still up for discussion, although quite a few facts hint at it.


I just looked around for more on this, and apparently it's a pretty long-debated discussion on whether he is a replicant or not. I haven't read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sleep, the book on which Blade Runner is (loosely) based, but apparently in the book Deckard is unequivocally human. Ridley Scott (who also did not read the book, supposedly) has since said that Deckard is a replicant, but there are no visible clues in the movie to indicate it either way. Harrison Ford has said that he believed Deckard to be human.

So, the book's author and the actor playing the character believe he is human, and the film's director believes he is a replicant. We can take that for what it's worth. Perhaps Scott was hoping that little mystery would keep people talking about the film, effectively lengthening its life. Do you think the movie would be as acclaimed today had the answer been explicitly stated outright?


It reminds me of the conclusion of Total Recall. People generally assume after the end of the film that Quaid's experiences were really happening to him and not a memory implant gone awry. However, the director has gone on record to indicate that the flash of light to close the film is his attempt at hinting that, much like the bald fatty warned, Quaid concluded his fantasy and was then lobotomized.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 1179 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 710 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 340 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 708 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 795 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 891 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 697 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 760 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 738 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 674 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 758 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 774 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 742 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 745 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 1062 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 910 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 686 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 698 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 923 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 710 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 336 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 658 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 670 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 650 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 717 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 865 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 714 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 719 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 719 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 665 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 802 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 866 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 646 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 694 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 628 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 377 Views

Reply to Message