Active Users:993 Time:03/08/2026 05:19:27 AM
Re: You know... TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM
Then again, I like that the movie offers the interpretation of him being a replicant but doesn't flat out say it, so it's still up for discussion, although quite a few facts hint at it.


I just looked around for more on this, and apparently it's a pretty long-debated discussion on whether he is a replicant or not. I haven't read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sleep, the book on which Blade Runner is (loosely) based, but apparently in the book Deckard is unequivocally human. Ridley Scott (who also did not read the book, supposedly) has since said that Deckard is a replicant, but there are no visible clues in the movie to indicate it either way. Harrison Ford has said that he believed Deckard to be human.

So, the book's author and the actor playing the character believe he is human, and the film's director believes he is a replicant. We can take that for what it's worth. Perhaps Scott was hoping that little mystery would keep people talking about the film, effectively lengthening its life. Do you think the movie would be as acclaimed today had the answer been explicitly stated outright?


It reminds me of the conclusion of Total Recall. People generally assume after the end of the film that Quaid's experiences were really happening to him and not a memory implant gone awry. However, the director has gone on record to indicate that the flash of light to close the film is his attempt at hinting that, much like the bald fatty warned, Quaid concluded his fantasy and was then lobotomized.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 1178 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 708 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 339 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 706 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 793 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 889 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 694 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 759 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 736 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 672 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 756 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 772 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 741 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 742 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 1059 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 907 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 685 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 695 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 921 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 709 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 335 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 655 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 668 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 647 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 714 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 862 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 713 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 716 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 717 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 662 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 800 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 863 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 643 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 691 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 627 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 377 Views

Reply to Message