Active Users:770 Time:18/12/2025 03:25:22 PM
That's not entirely right Etzel Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM
It's only logical that there actually must have been one very first Age, immediately after the Creator made the Wheel. Of course, after countless turnings of the Wheel, the names "first Age", "second Age" and so on lost their meaning a bit, since you could also call them the 1081. Age and the 1082. Age (or whatever would fit, if you count all Ages that ever occurred). However, since the particular Ages basically always have the same activity, it makes sense to name them always from 1st Age to 7th Age and not continuously increase the numbers in the names of the Ages or change the particular numbers of the Ages (at least from the PoV from an omniscient narrator).
This message last edited by Etzel on 22/04/2010 at 03:56:51 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1509 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1100 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 853 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 993 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 981 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 921 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 832 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 404 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 810 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 856 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 881 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 812 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 983 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 869 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 824 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 828 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 852 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 840 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 940 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 843 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 842 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 432 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 814 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 421 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 462 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 878 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 790 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 832 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1131 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 846 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 951 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1314 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 899 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 848 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 901 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 966 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 960 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 869 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 803 Views

Reply to Message