Active Users:520 Time:01/08/2026 06:15:00 PM
Re: More change? Kieran Send a noteboard - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM
From what? To what?

I thought it simply meant every turning was unique, not that it was consistently heading towards or away from something?


I'll try to find the quote. It basically says that each turning can have a little more flexibility to how things happen.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1683 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1231 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 991 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1128 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1124 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 1049 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 967 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 460 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 953 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 1023 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 1022 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 933 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1118 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 1002 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 962 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 979 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 970 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 982 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 1071 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 970 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 987 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 497 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 960 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 505 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 531 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 1035 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 913 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 977 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1276 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 1000 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1094 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1476 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 1032 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 985 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 1034 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1101 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1091 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 1020 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 938 Views

Reply to Message