Active Users:2084 Time:17/06/2026 05:00:01 PM
The question is... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM
If there was a first turning of the Wheel after its creation, with a first 1st Age, a first AoL, and so on, so that the Pattern could actually be woven bit by bit. Or if the whole Pattern, i.e. all of the past and future, was already there made by the Creator, as Fanatic-Templar seems to believe.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1647 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1207 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 970 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1101 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1095 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 1027 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 939 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 452 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 927 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 1002 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 1002 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 915 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1101 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 976 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 939 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 956 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 949 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 955 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 1044 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 942 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 969 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 484 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 936 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 489 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 514 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 998 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 888 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 958 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1242 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 970 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1067 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1441 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 1011 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 968 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 1013 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1082 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1068 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 1001 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 915 Views

Reply to Message