Active Users:172 Time:02/06/2024 08:59:29 AM
The question is... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM
If there was a first turning of the Wheel after its creation, with a first 1st Age, a first AoL, and so on, so that the Pattern could actually be woven bit by bit. Or if the whole Pattern, i.e. all of the past and future, was already there made by the Creator, as Fanatic-Templar seems to believe.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1170 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 811 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 580 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 689 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 655 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 620 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 555 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 283 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 532 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 609 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 603 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 538 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 689 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 585 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 523 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 553 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 547 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 549 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 602 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 555 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 562 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 301 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 522 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 269 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 330 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 607 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 514 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 549 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 833 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 556 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 663 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 983 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 607 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 578 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 613 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 672 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 625 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 573 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 526 Views

Reply to Message