Active Users:331 Time:07/07/2025 01:17:21 AM
The question is... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM
If there was a first turning of the Wheel after its creation, with a first 1st Age, a first AoL, and so on, so that the Pattern could actually be woven bit by bit. Or if the whole Pattern, i.e. all of the past and future, was already there made by the Creator, as Fanatic-Templar seems to believe.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1389 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 998 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 764 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 875 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 840 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 806 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 736 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 352 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 712 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 764 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 792 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 717 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 884 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 767 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 709 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 746 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 739 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 732 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 801 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 742 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 755 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 381 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 709 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 355 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 407 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 785 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 696 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 723 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1038 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 736 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 840 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1175 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 760 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 756 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 800 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 873 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 836 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 759 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 706 Views

Reply to Message