Active Users:427 Time:17/09/2025 11:57:43 PM
Re: More change? Kieran Send a noteboard - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM
From what? To what?

I thought it simply meant every turning was unique, not that it was consistently heading towards or away from something?


I'll try to find the quote. It basically says that each turning can have a little more flexibility to how things happen.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1420 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1030 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 792 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 907 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 874 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 835 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 766 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 371 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 743 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 788 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 819 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 746 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 911 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 797 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 738 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 775 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 771 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 759 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 837 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 767 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 784 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 395 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 737 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 379 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 424 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 817 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 723 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 753 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1063 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 766 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 870 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1209 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 794 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 781 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 830 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 899 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 890 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 783 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 735 Views

Reply to Message