Active Users:3883 Time:03/05/2026 12:11:27 PM
That's not entirely right Etzel Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM
It's only logical that there actually must have been one very first Age, immediately after the Creator made the Wheel. Of course, after countless turnings of the Wheel, the names "first Age", "second Age" and so on lost their meaning a bit, since you could also call them the 1081. Age and the 1082. Age (or whatever would fit, if you count all Ages that ever occurred). However, since the particular Ages basically always have the same activity, it makes sense to name them always from 1st Age to 7th Age and not continuously increase the numbers in the names of the Ages or change the particular numbers of the Ages (at least from the PoV from an omniscient narrator).
This message last edited by Etzel on 22/04/2010 at 03:56:51 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1610 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1172 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 943 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1068 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1068 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 1002 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 906 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 434 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 889 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 957 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 976 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 888 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1075 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 953 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 904 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 911 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 924 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 927 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 1015 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 914 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 933 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 464 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 910 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 471 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 498 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 961 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 863 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 934 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1214 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 937 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1044 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1405 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 982 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 946 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 983 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1046 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1044 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 960 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 881 Views

Reply to Message