Active Users:647 Time:17/06/2026 04:06:03 PM
That's not entirely right Etzel Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM
It's only logical that there actually must have been one very first Age, immediately after the Creator made the Wheel. Of course, after countless turnings of the Wheel, the names "first Age", "second Age" and so on lost their meaning a bit, since you could also call them the 1081. Age and the 1082. Age (or whatever would fit, if you count all Ages that ever occurred). However, since the particular Ages basically always have the same activity, it makes sense to name them always from 1st Age to 7th Age and not continuously increase the numbers in the names of the Ages or change the particular numbers of the Ages (at least from the PoV from an omniscient narrator).
This message last edited by Etzel on 22/04/2010 at 03:56:51 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1645 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 1205 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 969 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 1101 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 1095 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 1027 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 938 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 450 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 927 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 1002 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 1002 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 913 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 1101 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 974 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 938 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 956 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 948 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 955 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 1042 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 942 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 968 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 483 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 934 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 488 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 514 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 996 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 887 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 957 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1242 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 969 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 1067 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1440 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 1010 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 968 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 1012 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 1082 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 1068 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 1000 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 915 Views

Reply to Message