Active Users:344 Time:13/07/2025 04:21:47 PM
Fain and Slayer RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 07/07/2010 08:47:48 PM
Fain is probably just hunted by the Super Darkhound Pack (and likely Slayer) and will be killed soon (this scene will probably told by Slayer, who will then reveal that he killed the traitor Asmo as well). Fain's wildcard role is played, IMO. To give Fain yet another power base that late in the story doesn't make much sense.


Seems doubtful to me. RJ didn't initially envision revealing Asmo's killer in the books, and this scene would strike me as too obvious a possibility that he would have had to disregard. I also can't imagine Mordeth's role as a third force or a Rand-Fain confrontation of some sort, built up since TEotW, not playing a role in the Last Battle.

I'm not sure what having Slayer dust Fain off would accomplish more generally. If anything, it would resemble a certain scene in the last Dark Tower book that I and many other readers found unconvincing (which isn't to say that it couldn't work just as unconvincingly in this series, of course).

Reply to message
If Demandred isn't Roedran (or controlling Roedran) - 07/07/2010 10:08:19 AM 1654 Views
Others suggest... - 07/07/2010 10:31:33 AM 724 Views
Re: Others suggest... - 07/07/2010 10:46:31 AM 595 Views
Yeah... - 07/07/2010 11:03:21 AM 634 Views
Re: Yeah... - 07/07/2010 12:58:04 PM 725 Views
The thing is... - 07/07/2010 01:30:11 PM 567 Views
Re: The thing is... - 07/07/2010 03:24:34 PM 478 Views
As said... - 07/07/2010 03:56:20 PM 517 Views
Re: The thing is... - 07/07/2010 04:27:11 PM 467 Views
I think - 08/07/2010 09:00:46 AM 581 Views
It all began.... - 07/07/2010 11:49:39 AM 757 Views
The idea is... - 07/07/2010 12:39:19 PM 564 Views
No, Etzel... - 07/07/2010 01:03:20 PM 604 Views
I disagree... - 07/07/2010 01:18:11 PM 538 Views
And besides... - 07/07/2010 01:49:04 PM 543 Views
Fain and Slayer - 07/07/2010 08:47:48 PM 513 Views
Fain playing a significant role in the LB would too much allude to LotR, IMO. *NM* - 07/07/2010 11:28:29 PM 498 Views
As would Moiraine returning. - 08/07/2010 02:13:25 AM 571 Views
It depends on Fain's role... - 08/07/2010 08:34:27 AM 429 Views
But what does "wildcard" really mean? - 08/07/2010 03:19:16 PM 442 Views
for a long time i thought shara and their tattooed channeles. - 09/07/2010 05:24:16 PM 449 Views
Fain doesn't make sense from a timing stand point - 07/07/2010 04:46:00 PM 491 Views
Indeed... - 08/07/2010 08:42:45 AM 455 Views
agreed - 09/07/2010 05:56:23 PM 423 Views
One reason the Murandy-New SL theory makes sense... - 07/07/2010 07:19:56 PM 449 Views
That's most likely just coincidence. *NM* - 07/07/2010 11:30:00 PM 213 Views
Riiiight... because WoT is chock full of coincidences. - 08/07/2010 02:12:47 AM 427 Views
In any case... - 08/07/2010 08:31:19 AM 476 Views
Re: That's most likely just coincidence. - 08/07/2010 02:13:36 AM 458 Views
They followed Fain all the way to Caemlyn and shot arrows at Rand - 08/07/2010 04:21:14 AM 423 Views
Yeah, I agree, Roedran isn't under Fain's control. *NM* - 08/07/2010 08:38:15 AM 305 Views
Re: It all began.... - 08/07/2010 12:11:02 PM 424 Views
Murandy just doesn't fit Demandred. Also, Sammael could have been wrong. - 07/07/2010 07:57:19 PM 685 Views
Here's another possibility - 08/07/2010 02:21:25 AM 522 Views
Another possibility for Demandred - 08/07/2010 03:20:27 AM 441 Views
What if Demandred's base is... - 08/07/2010 04:52:40 AM 469 Views
my problem with this - 08/07/2010 04:59:35 AM 457 Views
Well, I tend to agree with you - 09/07/2010 12:27:04 AM 413 Views
I doubt that you could that easily control the Madmen. *NM* - 08/07/2010 08:44:42 AM 191 Views
Unlikely... maybe even impossible - 08/07/2010 10:14:24 AM 446 Views
Definitely possible. - 08/07/2010 02:06:57 PM 439 Views
Now here's a man with... vision! - 09/07/2010 12:24:13 AM 416 Views
not really - 10/07/2010 12:25:31 PM 423 Views
That's factually incorrect - 12/07/2010 12:41:48 AM 458 Views
yes, factually incorrect by you - 12/07/2010 08:02:23 AM 478 Views
- 12/07/2010 04:40:45 PM 411 Views
I think Lanfears' estimation is incorrect. - 13/07/2010 04:15:44 PM 450 Views

Reply to Message