Active Users:396 Time:01/05/2025 12:11:21 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM
Why not just give a couple Fades a list, instead of one name at a time? And then call them off if Carridin manages to complete his assignment? Or they could just not bother with calling them off, be evil and all that.

And in the quote, Mik says that SHv0.5 was the one carrying out the killing. That sounds more like personal involvement.

Reread the quote you quoted. Moridin ended up ordering Carridin's death.


I know he ordered it, but he didn't bother finding him and finishing him off.

The killing stopped because Moridin and SH were out of the picture so nobody was ordering the killings. Nothing says they did it personally.

1: Why did the killing of Carridins family stop for 2 months right after Ishamael died, while SHv0.5 made that promise and it was SHv0.5 that was carrying it out up untill that point? Note that this promise wasn't forgotten at all and that -in the end- Moridin ordered Carridin had to be killed according to SHv0.5's promise.
"And it breaks my heart to look around, and see the unimpressed; who can't believe the emperor is dressed"~Fastball
2-7-1
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1649 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1038 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 939 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 901 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 745 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 967 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 845 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1048 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 896 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1199 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 947 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1052 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 876 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 935 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 946 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 891 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 995 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 852 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1099 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1127 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 810 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 913 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 910 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 857 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 920 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 778 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 738 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 844 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 855 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 960 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 797 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 953 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 888 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 937 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 837 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 451 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1008 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 854 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 924 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 888 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 786 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 740 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 956 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 838 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 722 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 738 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 769 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 787 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 832 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 875 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 683 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 924 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 807 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 739 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 973 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 811 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 705 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 993 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes