Active Users:523 Time:09/04/2026 02:04:48 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM
1: Why did the killing of Carridins family stop for 2 months right after Ishamael died, while SHv0.5 made that promise and it was SHv0.5 that was carrying it out up untill that point? Note that this promise wasn't forgotten at all and that -in the end- Moridin ordered Carridin had to be killed according to SHv0.5's promise.

You think RJ just went out of his way to hide this in his books for kicks, eh?

- My answer: The killing stopped temporarily because Ishamael was linked to SHv0,5.


Really? The most trusted Forsaken was used as a simple hitman to motivate an only somewhat important Darkfriend?
I don't know Gher, but the fact still remains;
When Ishamael dies, the killings stop for two months. And after those months, they are picked up again. I don't have any more specifics. I'd have thought this was enough.

God knows, it was hard enough connecting all the dots. (combining timelines & all Carridin's remarks)

I could reverse the question; why else did it stop? You tell me. Give me an answer that comes from the books..?
There isn't one (and believe me, I've looked)

That doesn't remove the hint though.
Mik ~ Ishamaels halfmad 'brother'

Death dances in my footsteps....
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1898 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1288 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1180 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 1116 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 975 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1183 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 1034 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1294 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1127 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1452 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1152 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1299 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1109 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1192 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1206 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1130 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1216 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1061 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1448 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1437 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1043 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1152 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1134 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1079 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1107 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 1009 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 960 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1067 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1084 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1180 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1017 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1152 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1113 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1159 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1071 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 579 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1222 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1067 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1138 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1084 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1027 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 947 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1188 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1065 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 945 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 959 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 983 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 1011 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1076 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1097 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 905 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1126 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 1020 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 928 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1171 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1041 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 974 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1226 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes