Active Users:497 Time:09/04/2026 02:11:41 PM
Eh? Mik Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
That some time after Ishy's death, Sammael took control of Carridin. Serving his new master, certainly protected Carridin in a way. After all, Carridin wasn't immediately killed in LoC or ACoS, when SH and Moridin appeared, but not until after Sammael's death. He also wasn't killed in the way SH 0.5. threatened him, namely being tortured for years at SG, but rather quickly. Besides that, SH 0.5. gave the command to kill Rand, and we know that Moridin didn't want that after he was transmigrated.
Sammaels protection was bogus! Sammael protecting an insect? Ha! Sammael could care less.

And for all we know, Carridin could have been taken to Shayol Ghul still. If Shai'tan can catch Souls/ Minds to Transmigrate, why couldn't he catch Carridins dirty Darkfriend Soul to torture for all eternity and-then-some.
Reminds me of that burned darkfriend dying in TEotW looking hapilly untill the very last second in TAR.
Reminds me of the fire in the hearth at Shayol Ghul; all those tormented faces!

Besides, it's irrelevant if the promise is kept to the letter;
When Ishamael died, the killing stopped for 2 months.
The fact remains, no matter how much you clutter it with additional stuff..
Mik ~ Ishamaels halfmad 'brother'

Death dances in my footsteps....
This message last edited by Mik on 26/07/2010 at 05:31:33 PM
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1899 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1289 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1180 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1184 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1295 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 1127 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1452 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1152 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1299 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 1110 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1193 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1206 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 1131 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1216 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 1061 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1449 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1437 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 1044 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 1153 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 1135 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 1079 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 1108 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 1009 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 960 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 1068 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 1084 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1180 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 1017 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1153 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 1113 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1159 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 1071 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 580 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1222 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 1069 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1139 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 1084 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 1027 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 948 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1189 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 1065 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 945 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 959 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 983 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 1012 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 1076 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 1097 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 906 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1126 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 1020 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 928 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1172 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 1042 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 975 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1226 Views

Reply to Message