Active Users:380 Time:18/06/2025 01:36:52 AM
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
You suggest that Moridin and SH are one creature, fused together like Luc and Isam are, but actually also Ishy and SH 0.5. were already one creature. Your evidence is that the Trollocs named Ishy Ba'alzamon, and consequently he must have a physical link to a Myrddraal. The other evidence is that the Nae'blis is just half a step below the DO, and consequently the DO would fuse himself together with his Nae'blis. Finally, Carrdin was visited by SH 0.5. but after Ishy's death, Carridin was left alone for some reason, which is obviously that Ishy and SH 0.5. were one creature.

Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1693 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1088 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 983 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1009 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1089 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 936 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1242 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 989 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1096 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 917 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 977 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 986 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 932 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1034 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 892 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1224 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1254 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 854 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 954 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 949 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 896 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 958 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 816 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 777 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 884 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 898 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1000 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 838 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 992 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 926 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 977 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 882 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 480 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1048 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 894 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 964 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 928 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 827 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 780 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 997 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 877 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 768 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 777 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 806 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 830 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 873 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 917 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 723 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 964 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 847 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 775 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1009 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 854 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 747 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1034 Views

Reply to Message