Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
Etzel Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
IMO it's completely wrong. I believe it should be absolutely obvious to anyone that Moridin and SH are separate characters, after reading the books and what the authors said on this matter. For some reason, a few people always tend to come up with those ideas that Moridin must be Taim, or that Mordin is SH in disguise, or now that Moridin & SH form a Slayer-like creature.
In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.
Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.
I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense. Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.
Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.
I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense. Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
Moridin & Shadar Haran
- 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM
1823 Views
No...
- 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM
1199 Views
Re: No...
- 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM
1105 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM
1043 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
- 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM
899 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!)
- 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM
1117 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same
- 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM
978 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same.
- 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM
1374 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable
- 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM
1097 Views
Au contraire.
- 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM
1213 Views
But why...
- 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM
1038 Views
Again. RJ fooled you.
- 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM
1118 Views
I think it would have to work this way:
- 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM
1056 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think.
- 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM
1151 Views
Um not quite
- 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM
998 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak...
- 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM
961 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM
1081 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
1061 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
- 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM
1001 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
1038 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
- 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM
927 Views
The problem is...
- 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM
899 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years.
- 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM
997 Views
I already answered all this...
- 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM
1017 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong.
- 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM
1113 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are:
- 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM
1049 Views
No problem
- 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM
1097 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again..
- 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM
1152 Views
Just to understand you correctly...
- 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
994 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"?
- 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM
1071 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
- 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
1016 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM
1001 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
- 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM
870 Views
One should also remember...
- 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM
918 Views
Eh?
- 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
935 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM*
- 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM
999 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart?
- 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
1031 Views

*NM*
=
- Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela?