Active Users:1176 Time:14/09/2025 11:16:04 AM
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
IMO it's completely wrong. I believe it should be absolutely obvious to anyone that Moridin and SH are separate characters, after reading the books and what the authors said on this matter. For some reason, a few people always tend to come up with those ideas that Moridin must be Taim, or that Mordin is SH in disguise, or now that Moridin & SH form a Slayer-like creature.

In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.

Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.

I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense. Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1736 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1127 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 1028 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 1047 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1123 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 972 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1295 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 1031 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1130 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 954 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 1019 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 1024 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 966 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 1078 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 929 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1278 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1307 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 886 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 999 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 994 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 944 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 990 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 859 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 819 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 926 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 942 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 1044 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 880 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 1035 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 967 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 1018 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 924 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 500 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1095 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 933 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 1003 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 960 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 869 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 816 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 1042 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 923 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 820 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 817 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 849 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 875 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 913 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 963 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 772 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 1006 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 888 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 814 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 1052 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 901 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 788 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 1071 Views

Reply to Message