Sanderson's writing bothers me much less than it bothers some of the posters here, especially the more expert posters like DomA.
Brandon's style (he has a fairly generic one, IMO) doesn't bother me much, and I appreciate how much he was able to tone it down for WOT (his too heavy reliance on dialogue scenes annoyed me in his books, but for WOT he adapted very well to a more descriptive style). It's different from Jordan enough, but I never expected it would mimic Jordan, so...
What annoys me is much smaller things, like Brandon's mishandling of some WOT terminology (wrong forms of address and so on... Lord for "My Lord", Dragon for Dragon Reborn etc. there's so many) and that not enough of his "too modern" vocabulary was edited out by Harriet for my taste.
I would not notice that if Brandon was the original writer, but in WOT I found it very distracting. It's like I am into the story and forgetful of the fact it's not RJ at the helm, and suddenly there's a "Please, Lord Dragon" instead of "My Lord, please" that makes me wince and throws me out of the book...
I had higher expectations that Harriet would smooth out all those, as it had been mentionned before the book release that she kept a close eye on that (the story about arguing on the way Jordan spelled a verb vs. how Brandon did is one of the things that made me raise my expectations. I thought if they nitpick over that stuff, it meant all the little odditities had been taken care for! Not so). The prose, as such, I expected to be really different and it's actually more in the tone of Jordan than I had expected from reading Brandon's novels.
mistakes sanderson makes that bug you
- 23/09/2010 05:38:52 PM
2135 Views
Bael mentioning the Aiel Waste; characters using words that are too sophisticated or techical
- 23/09/2010 06:11:34 PM
1370 Views
I completely agree...
- 23/09/2010 08:54:17 PM
1233 Views
Re: I completely agree...
- 24/09/2010 01:57:38 AM
1155 Views
Re: I completely agree...
- 24/09/2010 06:39:17 PM
1084 Views
Oh, sh**, Moiraine! I never thought about that! The comments about her in tGS suggest you're right
- 26/09/2010 03:23:56 AM
1164 Views
The entire Graendal scene
- 23/09/2010 06:27:03 PM
1270 Views
I think this is the type of info that RJ never got around to revealing.
- 23/09/2010 08:46:51 PM
1090 Views
The writing in the Graendal scene surprised me
- 24/09/2010 12:20:50 AM
1091 Views
Re: The writing in the Graendal scene surprised me
- 24/09/2010 06:03:17 PM
1090 Views
Particularly the way he described sex. It reeked of Mormon discomfort with the topic.
- 24/09/2010 02:04:08 AM
1124 Views
Reeked? Great word. It seemed quite in line with RJ's own dealings with the topic. *NM*
- 24/09/2010 03:42:28 AM
485 Views
RJ had great sexual humor--he even went a little overboard sometimes IMO
- 24/09/2010 11:28:25 PM
987 Views
Re: RJ had great sexual humor--he even went a little overboard sometimes IMO
- 25/09/2010 08:56:47 PM
1005 Views
RJ said breasts all the time, but in a more clinical manner - folding arms under breasts, etc
- 26/09/2010 03:33:09 AM
1177 Views
Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too?
- 24/09/2010 04:09:48 AM
1058 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too?
- 24/09/2010 05:36:23 PM
1196 Views
A lot of those are reasons why I always thought she was alive..
- 24/09/2010 06:10:35 PM
1217 Views
Re: A lot of those are reasons why I always thought she was alive..
- 24/09/2010 07:54:54 PM
1064 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too?
- 25/09/2010 10:02:02 AM
960 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too?
- 25/09/2010 08:48:05 PM
1050 Views
Not really a mistake, I guess
- 25/09/2010 09:45:54 PM
970 Views
Well...
- 26/09/2010 06:30:54 AM
1081 Views
Thanks. I think I didn't notice it with RJ because
- 26/09/2010 06:35:47 AM
963 Views

*NM*