Active Users:1379 Time:03/05/2026 06:14:35 AM
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines... Narg Send a noteboard - 25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM
I think it is possible that he was trying to avoid some of the problems that RJ ran into after book 6 by allowing too many separate story arcs to unflod simultaneously. It is true that there is something lost in all of this hacking up of the timeline. But perhaps he felt it was an unacceptable risk to have a book that pushes each story ark the same amount and winds up having not a thing happen in any of them.

I know that some people were able to enjoy the great amount of subtlety happening in books 8-10 even while the plot progressed so little. But most people, myself included, were simply bored to tears and frustrated. If TGS had come out and in the end nothing had been resolved, ie Egwene was still a prisoner in the tower, Rand was still angry and dark, Mat had not gotten Moiraine out of the tower, Lan is still just a solitary man traveling the blight, etc... then perhaps too much of the fanbase would have checked out permanently now that the old author had passed on and the new one was both a less brilliant writer AND just as boring..

I realize I have oversimplified things by saying that there would be nothing resolved. But perhaps Brandon (and Harriet) decided that an inherent flaw of the series as RJ was writing it was that in order to maintain the depth and subtlety, the plot had to progress far too slowly for most readers' tastes. Assuming that Tor would not let TGS be 1500 pages, perhaps Brandon felt he either had to obliterate the continuity in order to progress at least some characters' arcs, or do what RJ did and progress everybody's arcs too little for most people's tastes.

I for one enjoyed TGS more than I enjoyed books 7-11, and by a very large margin. If I have to choose between a hacked up timeline or another set of story arcs that drag on over multiple books (like Perrin rescuing Faile, Elayne very slowly becoming Queen, Egwene and her army plodding toward and attacking Tar Valon, Mat escaping with Tuon and eventually getting her back to her people, etc...)

Those storylines all developed so slowly over so many books, that many people didn't care anymore if RJ was subtle, deep, and layered. They just wanted him to get on with the story. RJ's style of writing exacts too high a price on plot progression when there are so many story arcs going on. He let the number of story lines get out of hand and the result of maintaining his writing standard while dealing with so many different story lines was resoundingly bad for perhaps the majority of the fan base.

Brandon and Harriet may have decided that the hacked up timeline was the better of two evils. They may have been right.
A little learning is a dangerous thing.
Reply to message
Jason's review... Looks like DomA was right (Review is now removed) - 25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM 3802 Views
Re: Jason's review (spoilerish thoughts from me, so BEWARE!). Looks like DomA was right - 25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM 1609 Views
Pretty sure it's not Egwene... - 25/09/2010 07:07:00 AM 1530 Views
Oh well - I was wrong - 27/09/2010 03:56:59 PM 1242 Views
Ituralde - 25/09/2010 06:29:26 AM 1361 Views
Read the ToM rules - 25/09/2010 07:44:22 AM 1274 Views
I officially hate reviews of WoT (in general) - 25/09/2010 08:10:43 AM 1352 Views
I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 09:45:10 AM 1407 Views
Re: I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 03:50:40 PM 1265 Views
Perrin will probably gather the wolves... - 25/09/2010 09:57:06 AM 1385 Views
I suppose Olver could be the one who takes off Mat's eye *NM* - 25/09/2010 10:01:17 AM 640 Views
The review is now gone. *NM* - 25/09/2010 04:10:59 PM 651 Views
Unfortunately, there's not much left for Elayne to do. - 25/09/2010 07:14:09 PM 1448 Views
I haven't read the review but... - 25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM 1882 Views
That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 08:25:42 PM 1412 Views
It's odd, I didn't see any reference to Rand descending from DM in his review. - 25/09/2010 08:39:33 PM 1297 Views
It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 08:55:49 PM 1328 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:03:14 PM 1238 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:54:28 PM 1238 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 10:09:58 PM 1468 Views
Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 25/09/2010 10:46:23 PM 1348 Views
Re: Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 26/09/2010 01:11:52 AM 1338 Views
I blame JordanCon too. - 26/09/2010 02:17:50 AM 1417 Views
Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 26/09/2010 10:04:40 PM 1291 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 07:20:11 AM 1285 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 11:03:35 AM 1307 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 01:07:59 AM 1454 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 07:35:04 AM 1328 Views
Re: That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 09:49:17 PM 1554 Views
Some thoughts on a potential meeting... - 26/09/2010 05:11:06 AM 1433 Views
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines... - 25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM 1410 Views
To me it's two different things - 26/09/2010 01:48:13 AM 1502 Views
I agree - 26/09/2010 03:09:04 AM 1333 Views
My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 03:50:36 AM 1381 Views
Re: My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 11:42:12 PM 1625 Views
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM 1305 Views
Re: KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 09:35:41 PM 1453 Views
Whose really to blame though? - 27/09/2010 03:43:30 AM 1279 Views
A suggestion? - 26/09/2010 11:39:08 AM 1391 Views
Is there a copy of the review somewhere? *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:40:22 AM 740 Views
The review is back up... - 27/09/2010 01:59:50 AM 1241 Views
It wasn't quite identical... It was missing the line about Rand walking down from DM - 27/09/2010 06:42:47 AM 1281 Views
The line about Rand wasn't there when I read the review Saturday morning either. *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:57:00 PM 585 Views
It was... - 27/09/2010 04:22:24 PM 1111 Views
I must have missed it then. It does fit with Tor's not releasing Chapter 1 early. *NM* - 27/09/2010 05:06:36 PM 580 Views
What do you mean? - 27/09/2010 11:33:15 PM 1213 Views
It was at the very bottom of the post and hard to find - 28/09/2010 12:44:56 AM 1036 Views
Olver - 27/09/2010 11:34:40 AM 1424 Views
He's Demandred, natch. - 27/09/2010 03:54:09 PM 1130 Views
Re: Olver - 27/09/2010 05:42:25 PM 1242 Views
Re: Olver darkfriend? - 28/09/2010 12:02:11 AM 1296 Views
'Tis a shame. I love spoilers. - 27/09/2010 03:16:02 PM 1305 Views
One problem with the idea of a Rand-Egwene meeting in Chapter 1 beyond timeline issues - 27/09/2010 10:29:15 PM 1256 Views
Not true... - 28/09/2010 01:00:40 AM 1173 Views
Good call. I assumed, and still do, that the two events are one in the same. - 28/09/2010 01:10:13 AM 1260 Views
I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 01:47:40 AM 1107 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 02:00:59 AM 1151 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 03:07:08 AM 2059 Views
Not true indeed... and.... - 28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM 1455 Views
Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 28/09/2010 03:31:24 AM 1154 Views
Re: Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 13/10/2010 01:32:12 AM 1499 Views

Reply to Message