Active Users:131 Time:01/06/2024 02:21:58 AM
I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release. Tamyrlin Send a noteboard - 26/09/2010 03:04:24 AM
Dom, question - do we know for certain that Brandon picks the order of the chapters? I'd be surprised if Harriet left that to Brandon to determine, but maybe there is some interview quote out there that says Brandon chooses it?

And I thought this quote was applicable to this discussion, something from TL that you wrote earlier in 2009 before TGS was released. http://www.theoryland.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=1602&page=2



It's really quite possible that in TGS Rand and Egwene's story lines mirror one another as Perrin's and Rand's did in TSR. That would explain why Brandon decided to stack them together instead of Perrin + Rand, Egwene + Mat, for example. From another report, I understood that Brandon said TGS has the build up to TG from two story lines (Egwene + Rand, it seems), and 'teasers' for clusters 3-4, while book 13 will have the core events on the same timeline for Mat and Perrin, and the second part of the books will bring together everything. So basically, we could say we have the first 2/3 of Rand and Egwene in TGS with 1/3 or Mat and Perrin, and in book 13 there will be the last 2/3 of Mat/Perrin and the last third of Rand/Egwene. Linda and myself expect that cluster #5, in which Brandon put Elayne, Taim, the Bordermen etc. will be mostly absent from TGS.

The only worry I have is that it sounds fairly similar to what RJ attempted with WH/COT/KOD. It worked for me, and I don't mind that much to have to wait one more year before really getting into Mat/Perrin. I probably have to brace myself even more for the fact the book will be highly criticized. It's what I dislike about CoT - the fact more time is spent defending/attacking it than discussing it.


I'm with you about this particular format of the books; tackling story lines like this invites a high level of criticism as it pertains to chronology and potential chronological mistakes. But I'm hoping we spend more time discussing the content of these books rather than defending/attacking them. I do understand that your criticism has more to do with the way that Team Jordan decided to organize chapters in TGS and possibly ToM. But, there is nothing we can do about it, like arguing about Sweet covers at this point, don't you think?

Reply to message
Jason's review... Looks like DomA was right (Review is now removed) - 25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM 3352 Views
Re: Jason's review (spoilerish thoughts from me, so BEWARE!). Looks like DomA was right - 25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM 1191 Views
Pretty sure it's not Egwene... - 25/09/2010 07:07:00 AM 1127 Views
Oh well - I was wrong - 27/09/2010 03:56:59 PM 813 Views
Ituralde - 25/09/2010 06:29:26 AM 931 Views
Read the ToM rules - 25/09/2010 07:44:22 AM 855 Views
I officially hate reviews of WoT (in general) - 25/09/2010 08:10:43 AM 937 Views
I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 09:45:10 AM 1017 Views
Re: I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 03:50:40 PM 857 Views
Perrin will probably gather the wolves... - 25/09/2010 09:57:06 AM 998 Views
I suppose Olver could be the one who takes off Mat's eye *NM* - 25/09/2010 10:01:17 AM 453 Views
The review is now gone. *NM* - 25/09/2010 04:10:59 PM 465 Views
Unfortunately, there's not much left for Elayne to do. - 25/09/2010 07:14:09 PM 1045 Views
I haven't read the review but... - 25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM 1429 Views
That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 08:25:42 PM 1028 Views
It's odd, I didn't see any reference to Rand descending from DM in his review. - 25/09/2010 08:39:33 PM 859 Views
It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 08:55:49 PM 959 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:03:14 PM 862 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:54:28 PM 832 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 10:09:58 PM 1096 Views
Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 25/09/2010 10:46:23 PM 933 Views
Re: Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 26/09/2010 01:11:52 AM 927 Views
I blame JordanCon too. - 26/09/2010 02:17:50 AM 983 Views
Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 26/09/2010 10:04:40 PM 914 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 07:20:11 AM 888 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 11:03:35 AM 908 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 01:07:59 AM 977 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 07:35:04 AM 927 Views
Re: That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 09:49:17 PM 1121 Views
Some thoughts on a potential meeting... - 26/09/2010 05:11:06 AM 1048 Views
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines... - 25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM 998 Views
To me it's two different things - 26/09/2010 01:48:13 AM 1076 Views
I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release. - 26/09/2010 03:04:24 AM 929 Views
I agree - 26/09/2010 03:09:04 AM 898 Views
My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 03:50:36 AM 960 Views
Re: My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 11:42:12 PM 1152 Views
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM 886 Views
Re: KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 09:35:41 PM 999 Views
Whose really to blame though? - 27/09/2010 03:43:30 AM 873 Views
A suggestion? - 26/09/2010 11:39:08 AM 1019 Views
Is there a copy of the review somewhere? *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:40:22 AM 548 Views
The review is back up... - 27/09/2010 01:59:50 AM 866 Views
It wasn't quite identical... It was missing the line about Rand walking down from DM - 27/09/2010 06:42:47 AM 858 Views
The line about Rand wasn't there when I read the review Saturday morning either. *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:57:00 PM 392 Views
It was... - 27/09/2010 04:22:24 PM 726 Views
I must have missed it then. It does fit with Tor's not releasing Chapter 1 early. *NM* - 27/09/2010 05:06:36 PM 405 Views
What do you mean? - 27/09/2010 11:33:15 PM 775 Views
It was at the very bottom of the post and hard to find - 28/09/2010 12:44:56 AM 678 Views
Olver - 27/09/2010 11:34:40 AM 1011 Views
He's Demandred, natch. - 27/09/2010 03:54:09 PM 760 Views
Re: Olver - 27/09/2010 05:42:25 PM 822 Views
Re: Olver darkfriend? - 28/09/2010 12:02:11 AM 880 Views
'Tis a shame. I love spoilers. - 27/09/2010 03:16:02 PM 885 Views
One problem with the idea of a Rand-Egwene meeting in Chapter 1 beyond timeline issues - 27/09/2010 10:29:15 PM 803 Views
Not true... - 28/09/2010 01:00:40 AM 798 Views
Good call. I assumed, and still do, that the two events are one in the same. - 28/09/2010 01:10:13 AM 870 Views
I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 01:47:40 AM 727 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 02:00:59 AM 774 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 03:07:08 AM 1607 Views
Not true indeed... and.... - 28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM 1032 Views
Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 28/09/2010 03:31:24 AM 750 Views
Re: Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 13/10/2010 01:32:12 AM 1082 Views

Reply to Message