Active Users:597 Time:19/03/2026 12:33:14 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM
when sul'dam tried to make AS damane channel weapon they simply could not do it, even forcing them there was no instances of them dying
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 1074 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 788 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 685 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 682 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 692 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 655 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 291 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 645 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 794 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 666 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 653 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 679 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 741 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 732 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 270 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 272 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 307 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 271 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 660 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 743 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 720 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 651 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 657 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 657 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 339 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 676 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 325 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 662 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 682 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes