Active Users:816 Time:01/02/2026 05:53:10 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM
Unless it stops them from holding the Power it won't work because they or immune to compulsion when doing so.


That was only from the Warder Bond and possibly the weave people like Graendal use. There is no way of saying the Binder does the same thing as the weaves or the Bond and a ter'angreal is a bit different anyway. Could be specifically designed to work around men holding the Power being resistant to Compulsion.

Quite honestly you are extrapolating a couple of comments into a rather large blanket statement. Rand may well only have been able to resist the Bond Compulsion because he was vastly stronger than Alanna. What happens if Graendal tries with a weak man?
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 1049 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 769 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 660 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 664 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 663 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 633 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 286 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 621 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 772 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 642 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 631 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 657 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 720 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 709 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 261 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 264 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 300 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 262 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 636 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 720 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 701 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 635 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 638 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 638 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 327 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 648 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 311 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 643 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 660 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes