Seriously. A lot of people have been so stupid over this whole style thing. Sheesh!
everynametaken Send a noteboard - 17/10/2010 01:31:45 AM
Just kidding. Good work, it is nice you get a carrot for all the hard work you do.
But there aren't many review copies going out. I think only a few dozen total. I know of two others at least who've received them and I suspect it might be something that really will avoid most leaks until release date.
But after 120 pages, there's already been a surprising reveal and a foreshadowing that will provoke quite a bit of discussion before AMoL is released. There are some nice new adds as well, but the change in writing style is very noticeable. But considering how I often loathed RJ's garrulous prose, that's not such a bad thing, but some who complained about the shift in TGS will not be pleased, I suspect.
Sandersons prose isn't bad, just different, from what I can see, and, as you note, Jordan wasn't always the paragon of perfection himself. Sanderson still seems like a pretty good writer, so as long as he gets all the details the way Jordan plotted them and isn't flat out clumsy with his prose I don't think it's fair to fault him for not being Jordan. I mean, would you rather the story never got told? I won't say Jordans prose was NEVER clumsy, but there were a few times when, shall we say, a mouse could starve on the difference. We could analyze the difference, but the candle probably isn't worth the wick. Also, you can't roller skate in a buffalo herd.

But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
I just received my review copy of ToM
- 15/10/2010 10:52:23 PM
19697 Views
Thanks for showing off Mr. Fancy Pants
- 15/10/2010 10:56:57 PM
1477 Views
- 15/10/2010 10:56:57 PM
1477 Views
I've received some interesting things over the years
- 16/10/2010 12:39:59 AM
1730 Views
Meh. I wish people would get over it.
- 16/10/2010 08:04:37 AM
1590 Views
Seriously. A lot of people have been so stupid over this whole style thing. Sheesh!
- 17/10/2010 01:31:45 AM
1440 Views
See, I never anticipated it being the same in the first place...
- 17/10/2010 03:20:16 AM
1431 Views
Lucky you!
- 16/10/2010 01:56:16 AM
1453 Views
Oh, just think about belief and order a bit
- 16/10/2010 02:01:31 AM
1689 Views
- 16/10/2010 02:01:31 AM
1689 Views
Re: I just received my review copy of ToM
- 16/10/2010 02:06:36 AM
1446 Views
I'm only 160 pages into it and won't finish it tonight...I think
- 16/10/2010 02:17:53 AM
1674 Views
I'd be interested in this question as well, once you've finished. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 02:28:39 AM
1462 Views
Has it lived up to your initial excitement on looking at the ending thus far? *NM*
- 16/10/2010 11:11:44 AM
884 Views
It's a surprising book in many ways
- 16/10/2010 03:25:13 PM
1685 Views
A few questions, assuming you've now finished
- 16/10/2010 03:39:57 PM
1526 Views
I don't read in a lineal fashion, so I'm only 50% done
- 16/10/2010 03:58:34 PM
1631 Views
Damn. I bet we're in for a cliffhanger. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 04:01:56 PM
1308 Views
- 16/10/2010 04:03:48 PM
1502 Views
- 16/10/2010 04:03:48 PM
1502 Views
I think you'd have denied it if it weren't true. I call unspoken confirmation. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 04:13:47 PM
1479 Views
Is this in reference to Brandon's 'small unnoticed detail' from books 4-6?
- 17/10/2010 10:35:37 PM
1620 Views
Ironically Sanderson's signature looks like he tried to cross out his own name from the title page *NM*
- 16/10/2010 12:22:33 PM
870 Views
Warning for everyone who tends to read the Glossary first
- 16/10/2010 03:16:09 PM
1803 Views
Certainly...
- 16/10/2010 03:36:29 PM
1694 Views
Or it might be that the glossary reveals that the murderer him/herself gets done over in ToM.
- 16/10/2010 03:41:21 PM
1511 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 16/10/2010 03:59:36 PM
1712 Views
- 16/10/2010 03:59:36 PM
1712 Views
Demandred killed Asmodean?
- 16/10/2010 04:34:27 PM
1454 Views
Oh I know!
- 16/10/2010 04:44:54 PM
1548 Views
Those are separate things
- 16/10/2010 04:48:31 PM
1637 Views
Can you at least say this much
- 16/10/2010 05:26:55 PM
1563 Views
Some found it so
- 16/10/2010 05:28:56 PM
1753 Views
That would seem to rule out everyone but...
- 17/10/2010 10:33:08 PM
1556 Views
Obviously Slayer has the power to block someone from the OP for three seconds!
- 16/10/2010 05:07:10 PM
1569 Views
- 16/10/2010 05:07:10 PM
1569 Views
I'm surprised no one has commented on the autographed quote in my second photo
- 16/10/2010 04:06:14 PM
2023 Views
Re: I'm surprised no one has commented on the autographed quote in my second photo
- 16/10/2010 04:25:27 PM
1686 Views
Re-read that song line sometime
- 16/10/2010 04:33:12 PM
1636 Views
Re: Re-read that song line sometime
- 16/10/2010 11:50:54 PM
1425 Views
Um, I know that
- 16/10/2010 11:52:04 PM
1427 Views
I know you know that. I was just noting the odd thing you hinted at explicitly. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 11:55:21 PM
1349 Views
Re: I just received my review copy of ToM
- 16/10/2010 04:24:51 PM
1466 Views
And one last general question from me
- 16/10/2010 05:51:51 PM
1344 Views
Thematically, TGS
- 16/10/2010 06:00:47 PM
1866 Views
Thanks, I'm happy with either the thematic or "stuff happening" model. *NM*
- 16/10/2010 06:40:22 PM
1198 Views
I forgot to mention that the dedication page references both Linda and Mike *NM*
- 17/10/2010 12:24:40 AM
944 Views
You now sound as cryptic as Sanderson does and Jordan did.
- 18/10/2010 06:29:45 PM
1338 Views
Ha! I actually said a lot more than I meant to, ironically enough
- 18/10/2010 10:19:43 PM
1279 Views
- 18/10/2010 10:19:43 PM
1279 Views

