Active Users:765 Time:06/11/2026 10:24:08 PM
Yeah, I'll buy that. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/10/2010 03:05:41 AM
I think Moraine and Thom could become the healthiest. Also, Loial and Erith (is that how it's spelled?) have a pretty healthy realtionship.

I think I may even have sold part of it once upon a time.... :P
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 21/10/2010 11:53:08 PM 2193 Views
Nice! I welcome a happy ending for the WoT's healthiest realtionship! *NM* - 22/10/2010 01:07:10 AM 607 Views
oh I don't know. - 22/10/2010 03:03:56 AM 1198 Views
Really? Healthy? - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM 1141 Views
Yeah, I'll buy that. - 23/10/2010 03:05:41 AM 1497 Views
Re: Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 22/10/2010 02:23:31 AM 1217 Views
That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 03:07:18 AM 1026 Views
Re: That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 05:06:24 AM 1080 Views
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM 1058 Views
Re: Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 06:05:21 AM 1119 Views
It always feels kind of cheap to think of it that way though. - 23/10/2010 08:07:34 AM 1168 Views
lol, actually, yeah!! - 24/10/2010 06:59:54 AM 1111 Views
That's (hopefully) different. - 24/10/2010 08:05:18 AM 1045 Views
Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 08:46:59 AM 1196 Views
Re: Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 01:59:02 PM 1128 Views
RJ himself confirmed that all of mins visions were about the future. *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:58:52 PM 598 Views
Yes, Min only sees the future, per RJ. (woops, fixed the bad link) - 23/10/2010 03:09:56 AM 1419 Views
well, that answers that then *NM* - 23/10/2010 03:57:58 PM 490 Views

Reply to Message