Active Users:995 Time:07/08/2026 03:47:03 PM
Really? Healthy? Artsapat Send a noteboard - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM
I think Moraine and Thom could become the healthiest. Also, Loial and Erith (is that how it's spelled?) have a pretty healthy realtionship.


With her and his mother deciding amongst themselves that he should get married? He may agree with it, plus it's their culture, but still it's nowhere near an equal relationship.
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 21/10/2010 11:53:08 PM 2140 Views
Nice! I welcome a happy ending for the WoT's healthiest realtionship! *NM* - 22/10/2010 01:07:10 AM 585 Views
oh I don't know. - 22/10/2010 03:03:56 AM 1141 Views
Really? Healthy? - 22/10/2010 12:53:59 PM 1091 Views
Yeah, I'll buy that. - 23/10/2010 03:05:41 AM 1436 Views
Re: Something sweet I caught in the re-read - 22/10/2010 02:23:31 AM 1163 Views
That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 03:07:18 AM 970 Views
Re: That's how I took it, too, and always considered it the basis of the Olver=Gaidal theories. - 23/10/2010 05:06:24 AM 1019 Views
Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 05:21:19 AM 1009 Views
Re: Sometimes it almost felt like RJ set us up for that kind of stuff. - 23/10/2010 06:05:21 AM 1059 Views
It always feels kind of cheap to think of it that way though. - 23/10/2010 08:07:34 AM 1113 Views
lol, actually, yeah!! - 24/10/2010 06:59:54 AM 1050 Views
That's (hopefully) different. - 24/10/2010 08:05:18 AM 991 Views
Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 08:46:59 AM 1135 Views
Re: Do we know that Min can't see past lives? - 22/10/2010 01:59:02 PM 1077 Views
RJ himself confirmed that all of mins visions were about the future. *NM* - 22/10/2010 05:58:52 PM 575 Views
Yes, Min only sees the future, per RJ. (woops, fixed the bad link) - 23/10/2010 03:09:56 AM 1363 Views
well, that answers that then *NM* - 23/10/2010 03:57:58 PM 466 Views

Reply to Message