Active Users:507 Time:27/10/2026 05:36:38 PM
Prologue: A Question on Gateways Night Walker Send a noteboard - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM
I should say first that I haven’t read it. Also this may have been covered in other thread that I missed but it just came to me and thought to ask everyone.

My question, how come Graendal’s Gateway weave isn’t destroyed by Rand’s Balefire? Shouldn't the weave have been wiped out, thus never opening in the first place, or do the temporal properties of Balefire only work on non-power things?
This message last edited by Night Walker on 25/10/2010 at 08:37:32 PM
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1852 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 557 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 599 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 1364 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 491 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 487 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 1181 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 1237 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 1172 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 1258 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 1233 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 1272 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 1190 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 1072 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 1166 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 1023 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 1042 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 1347 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 1152 Views

Reply to Message