Active Users:581 Time:02/08/2025 03:42:11 PM
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities Sidious Send a noteboard - 25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM

Graendal has trouble releasing the gateway, but I personally think she tied it off and was desperately trying to unravel it in time.

It's also possible that the balefire didn't 'reach' the weave by the time she released it i.e. the rest of the palace was being devoured by balefire and just before it hit her gateway she released it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1574 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 427 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 391 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities - 25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM 952 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 1011 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 354 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 359 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 882 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 912 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 840 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 944 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 929 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 1014 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 897 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 785 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 850 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 739 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 764 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 1006 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 819 Views

Reply to Message