Active Users:861 Time:01/11/2025 05:54:13 PM
*nods* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM
And we've never seen any indication that balefire removes a weave or flows; that's what slicing and untying weaves are for.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1626 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 457 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 434 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 1082 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 385 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 386 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 939 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 989 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 918 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 1015 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 993 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 1071 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 951 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 847 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 927 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 789 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 817 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 1089 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 882 Views

Reply to Message