Active Users:658 Time:12/09/2026 10:53:44 PM
Re: Yes. saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM
I havent finished ToM (250 pages in) so maybe the answer to my question is somewhere ahead, but knowing that Graendal was "responsible" is making me itch with impatience--

Basically, do we now know how she fit RJ's criteria? Namely what has driven me bonkers has been the "how" PLUS "where" = final death.

Is there an answer as to how and where Asmo died?

How: Graendal killed him.

Where: In the pantry (probably, based on the lack of any creativity behind this 'mystery' ).

c'mon. what i'm talking about is the big deal that RJ made of the fact that Asmo's death was made final by virtue of how he died and where he died.

You mean that explanation wasn't good enough for you? Who do you think you are, saidarisnowtainted? :angry:



Arggggghh! What i'm trying to ask is can anybody explain the manner in which Asmo's death was final due to the combination of "how" AND "where" he died? How did he die and where did he die to cause this result? How did Graendal satisfy this criterion?
Reply to message
Explaining Asmo - ToM SPOILERS - 04/11/2010 06:08:54 PM 1625 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:12:21 PM 1386 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:17:51 PM 1135 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:16 PM 1170 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:34:42 PM 943 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:42:05 PM 1226 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:00:42 PM 941 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:31:18 PM 1128 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:23 PM 934 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM 972 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:43:02 PM 1051 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:47:44 PM 947 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:55:01 PM 990 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:24:53 PM 919 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:47:37 PM 815 Views
it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:16:53 PM 932 Views
Re: it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:23:39 PM 960 Views
Well, the prevalent pre-reveal theory was... - 06/11/2010 07:14:46 AM 1173 Views

Reply to Message