Active Users:1517 Time:22/08/2025 03:37:17 AM
Re: Yes. saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM
I havent finished ToM (250 pages in) so maybe the answer to my question is somewhere ahead, but knowing that Graendal was "responsible" is making me itch with impatience--

Basically, do we now know how she fit RJ's criteria? Namely what has driven me bonkers has been the "how" PLUS "where" = final death.

Is there an answer as to how and where Asmo died?

How: Graendal killed him.

Where: In the pantry (probably, based on the lack of any creativity behind this 'mystery' ).

c'mon. what i'm talking about is the big deal that RJ made of the fact that Asmo's death was made final by virtue of how he died and where he died.

You mean that explanation wasn't good enough for you? Who do you think you are, saidarisnowtainted? :angry:



Arggggghh! What i'm trying to ask is can anybody explain the manner in which Asmo's death was final due to the combination of "how" AND "where" he died? How did he die and where did he die to cause this result? How did Graendal satisfy this criterion?
Reply to message
Explaining Asmo - ToM SPOILERS - 04/11/2010 06:08:54 PM 1367 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:12:21 PM 1182 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:17:51 PM 932 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:16 PM 964 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:34:42 PM 738 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:42:05 PM 995 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:00:42 PM 733 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:31:18 PM 910 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:23 PM 732 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM 744 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:43:02 PM 845 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:47:44 PM 735 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:55:01 PM 792 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:24:53 PM 713 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:47:37 PM 618 Views
it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:16:53 PM 714 Views
Re: it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:23:39 PM 755 Views
Well, the prevalent pre-reveal theory was... - 06/11/2010 07:14:46 AM 968 Views

Reply to Message