Active Users:955 Time:11/07/2026 01:11:47 PM
Re: Yes. saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM
I havent finished ToM (250 pages in) so maybe the answer to my question is somewhere ahead, but knowing that Graendal was "responsible" is making me itch with impatience--

Basically, do we now know how she fit RJ's criteria? Namely what has driven me bonkers has been the "how" PLUS "where" = final death.

Is there an answer as to how and where Asmo died?

How: Graendal killed him.

Where: In the pantry (probably, based on the lack of any creativity behind this 'mystery' ).

c'mon. what i'm talking about is the big deal that RJ made of the fact that Asmo's death was made final by virtue of how he died and where he died.

You mean that explanation wasn't good enough for you? Who do you think you are, saidarisnowtainted? :angry:



Arggggghh! What i'm trying to ask is can anybody explain the manner in which Asmo's death was final due to the combination of "how" AND "where" he died? How did he die and where did he die to cause this result? How did Graendal satisfy this criterion?
Reply to message
Explaining Asmo - ToM SPOILERS - 04/11/2010 06:08:54 PM 1606 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:12:21 PM 1358 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:17:51 PM 1109 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:16 PM 1143 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:34:42 PM 906 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:42:05 PM 1196 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:00:42 PM 907 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:31:18 PM 1091 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:23 PM 910 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM 944 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:43:02 PM 1021 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:47:44 PM 919 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:55:01 PM 962 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:24:53 PM 895 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:47:37 PM 790 Views
it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:16:53 PM 898 Views
Re: it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:23:39 PM 925 Views
Well, the prevalent pre-reveal theory was... - 06/11/2010 07:14:46 AM 1143 Views

Reply to Message