Active Users:455 Time:14/12/2025 04:52:27 AM
Agreed TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 06/11/2010 02:12:41 AM
Anyone who defended RJ's pacing in books 7-11 should be ashamed at this point. He could have resolved a lot of those subplots with more depth and care, and done it earlier. There is no reason why he needed to drag it out the way he did. Particularly the Perrin subplot, but a lot of Seanchan stuff as well.


I thought all things considered BS did a pretty good job of getting things done these last two books. The obvious issues with timelines and poor editing aside, he kept it engaging and his Mat improved, which is always nice.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
Reply to message
Anyone else wonder how the hell everything will get wrapped up in 1 more book? - 05/11/2010 10:31:05 PM 1730 Views
I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo *NM* - 05/11/2010 10:51:02 PM 461 Views
Re: I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo - 05/11/2010 10:52:13 PM 951 Views
Re: I'm not worried about it as long as there's plenty o' Mo - 05/11/2010 11:05:49 PM 925 Views
I think Mo (and her new angreal) will the the third with Rand and Nyn *NM* - 06/11/2010 03:50:07 PM 465 Views
I'm 99%, plus... - 10/11/2010 03:44:48 AM 784 Views
The climax of ToM should have been mid-plot - 06/11/2010 12:06:14 AM 1333 Views
If it sucks as much as Towers of Midnight, I don't care. - 06/11/2010 12:07:38 AM 1624 Views
Agreed - 06/11/2010 02:12:41 AM 965 Views
Re: If it sucks as much as Towers of Midnight, I don't care. - 06/11/2010 04:02:48 AM 1638 Views
I tend to think a LOT more things stalled Jordan. - 06/11/2010 05:29:50 AM 1052 Views
- 06/11/2010 06:04:52 PM 802 Views
Well... - 07/11/2010 06:03:31 PM 991 Views
Nice analysis. *NM* - 15/11/2010 01:45:10 AM 348 Views
It won't. - 06/11/2010 12:30:47 AM 898 Views
Re: It won't. - 06/11/2010 05:50:10 AM 817 Views
Re: It won't. - 23/11/2010 02:46:52 PM 809 Views
It would have taken Jordan 4 or 5 more..... - 06/11/2010 03:44:30 PM 875 Views

Reply to Message