i don't like this theory because Murandy is so small. why would demandred settle for that?
mazza3 Send a noteboard - 10/11/2010 03:26:35 PM
i think it would be a stronger subplot if demandred was in control of shara, the beasts of the blight or the isle of madmen. why would the armies of one small nation matter so much, UNLESS he is using murandy as his staging point (i.e., it is a very central nation and will use it to attack from within)? but that means that he's somehow been hiding hundreds of thousands of shadowspawn within the boarders; is it remotely possible that someone didn't see that?
So all the rulers of Randland are going to be in one place (I guess this has spoilers)
10/11/2010 12:38:57 AM
- 877 Views
Okay... so?
10/11/2010 01:43:08 AM
- 503 Views
yeah, this was pretty pointless. unless this dude hasn't read the book and went Nostradamus on us *NM*
10/11/2010 02:53:24 AM
- 148 Views
It seems Roedran of Murandy won't be there
10/11/2010 11:57:11 AM
- 517 Views
i don't like this theory because Murandy is so small. why would demandred settle for that?
10/11/2010 03:26:35 PM
- 357 Views
Re: i don't like this theory because Murandy is so small. why would demandred settle for that?
11/11/2010 05:35:19 AM
- 480 Views