Active Users:525 Time:04/08/2026 04:58:32 AM
7 out of 10 RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM
I think Brian Sanderson did a pretty good job, but on a personal note I wasn't invested in some of the characters that were given major POVs, which made the book seem like it was trying to make their roles be larger than they had to be as a matter of checking off a list of things to wrap up (Gawyn, Perrin and Galad fall into this category). I did notice the timeline issue that some readers had warned us about moreso than I thought I would - it becomes a problem when I tried to consider where the various characters were in relation to each other, and I had to consciously remind myself to not think about it. This could have been solved by creative editing and moving some sections around - it really felt as if the flow of the story was off even though the pace was going well.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Post your review of Towers of Midnight - 07/11/2010 04:20:11 PM 11257 Views
Received Book On Friday... At Chapter 23... - 07/11/2010 08:29:29 PM 1735 Views
Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 10:34:23 PM 1956 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 11:02:39 PM 1956 Views
Makes a lot of sense really *NM* - 08/11/2010 12:55:47 AM 860 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 10/11/2010 04:30:06 AM 1489 Views
Fair assessment. - 16/11/2010 06:39:56 AM 1595 Views
5/10 *spoliers* - 08/11/2010 07:54:10 PM 1947 Views
About not sensing gholam. Nobody sensed him. It's the ability of the thing, I think *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:03:45 PM 838 Views
If so, then I forgot. I'd like a reference to that, though. *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:06:05 PM 936 Views
It does make logical sense... - 08/11/2010 10:49:51 PM 1541 Views
You wanted MORE of Elayne's political maneuvering ? - 08/11/2010 11:18:42 PM 1747 Views
Yes. I personally would've liked all that to be more detailed. - 09/11/2010 06:11:44 PM 1624 Views
That should have been more detailed... - 05/12/2010 02:46:07 AM 1521 Views
Some parts, yes. *NM* - 05/12/2010 04:18:21 PM 944 Views
6.9 out of 10, Does the Job with Some Nice Moments - 10/11/2010 04:26:08 AM 1790 Views
<Whoops, posted in the wrong place> *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:29:22 AM 751 Views
5 out of 10. it's ok, but... - 15/11/2010 05:59:00 PM 1728 Views
Seriously? - 05/12/2010 02:50:15 AM 1837 Views
7 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM 1640 Views
9 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 08:27:00 PM 1651 Views
4/5 Expected a bit more about the BT - 17/11/2010 04:17:25 AM 1760 Views
Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 20/11/2010 11:43:39 PM 1674 Views
And this is why being a critic sucks... - 26/11/2010 07:33:45 AM 1481 Views
Re: Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 19/12/2010 05:40:56 AM 2068 Views
8.5/10, enjoyed it alot. *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:30:32 AM 984 Views
I'm an idiot - 04/12/2010 06:18:46 PM 1975 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 05/12/2010 01:53:23 PM 1438 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 19/12/2010 05:48:30 AM 1596 Views
After a very long break from WoT... I'm back into it and loving it! - 05/12/2010 03:08:57 AM 1693 Views
Verdict: it was OK, 6.5/10, maybe 7, I need to reread it - 03/01/2011 02:41:34 AM 1836 Views
8 out of 10 - 09/01/2011 05:19:37 PM 1677 Views
Solid but not great continuation of the series, both exciting and flawed - 05/04/2011 08:34:48 AM 1694 Views

Reply to Message