Active Users:1129 Time:19/09/2026 03:25:11 AM
7 out of 10 RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM
I think Brian Sanderson did a pretty good job, but on a personal note I wasn't invested in some of the characters that were given major POVs, which made the book seem like it was trying to make their roles be larger than they had to be as a matter of checking off a list of things to wrap up (Gawyn, Perrin and Galad fall into this category). I did notice the timeline issue that some readers had warned us about moreso than I thought I would - it becomes a problem when I tried to consider where the various characters were in relation to each other, and I had to consciously remind myself to not think about it. This could have been solved by creative editing and moving some sections around - it really felt as if the flow of the story was off even though the pace was going well.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Post your review of Towers of Midnight - 07/11/2010 04:20:11 PM 11279 Views
Received Book On Friday... At Chapter 23... - 07/11/2010 08:29:29 PM 1760 Views
Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 10:34:23 PM 1989 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 11:02:39 PM 1984 Views
Makes a lot of sense really *NM* - 08/11/2010 12:55:47 AM 880 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 10/11/2010 04:30:06 AM 1523 Views
Fair assessment. - 16/11/2010 06:39:56 AM 1623 Views
5/10 *spoliers* - 08/11/2010 07:54:10 PM 1988 Views
About not sensing gholam. Nobody sensed him. It's the ability of the thing, I think *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:03:45 PM 856 Views
If so, then I forgot. I'd like a reference to that, though. *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:06:05 PM 954 Views
It does make logical sense... - 08/11/2010 10:49:51 PM 1581 Views
You wanted MORE of Elayne's political maneuvering ? - 08/11/2010 11:18:42 PM 1775 Views
Yes. I personally would've liked all that to be more detailed. - 09/11/2010 06:11:44 PM 1654 Views
That should have been more detailed... - 05/12/2010 02:46:07 AM 1544 Views
Some parts, yes. *NM* - 05/12/2010 04:18:21 PM 962 Views
6.9 out of 10, Does the Job with Some Nice Moments - 10/11/2010 04:26:08 AM 1818 Views
<Whoops, posted in the wrong place> *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:29:22 AM 770 Views
5 out of 10. it's ok, but... - 15/11/2010 05:59:00 PM 1763 Views
Seriously? - 05/12/2010 02:50:15 AM 1884 Views
7 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM 1671 Views
9 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 08:27:00 PM 1691 Views
4/5 Expected a bit more about the BT - 17/11/2010 04:17:25 AM 1787 Views
Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 20/11/2010 11:43:39 PM 1701 Views
And this is why being a critic sucks... - 26/11/2010 07:33:45 AM 1510 Views
Re: Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 19/12/2010 05:40:56 AM 2111 Views
8.5/10, enjoyed it alot. *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:30:32 AM 1009 Views
I'm an idiot - 04/12/2010 06:18:46 PM 2008 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 05/12/2010 01:53:23 PM 1461 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 19/12/2010 05:48:30 AM 1633 Views
After a very long break from WoT... I'm back into it and loving it! - 05/12/2010 03:08:57 AM 1726 Views
Verdict: it was OK, 6.5/10, maybe 7, I need to reread it - 03/01/2011 02:41:34 AM 1882 Views
8 out of 10 - 09/01/2011 05:19:37 PM 1704 Views
Solid but not great continuation of the series, both exciting and flawed - 05/04/2011 08:34:48 AM 1725 Views

Reply to Message