Active Users:1395 Time:01/05/2026 09:41:17 PM
Why was Callandor not considered? Knightscape Send a noteboard - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM

In this point in time it looks more and more likely that Callandor is being considered the key to re-sealing the bore, which begs the question of why it was not being considered in the Age Of Legends.

The men of the time favored using seals which ultimately led to the taint and the breaking of the world. The women favored using the Choedan Kal, which if used against the DO would have meant the destruction of creation, but was ultimately needed for the cleansing of the taint. This seems to be a perfect example of the workings of the Pattern. Now with that being said why didn't the pattern just push LTT to use Callandor to re-seal the bore in the first place?
All good things come to those who wait.
Reply to message
Why was Callandor not considered? - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM 1478 Views
seems like a question of fate vs. free will - 20/11/2010 10:40:51 PM 1039 Views
The pattern quite clearly does like throwing it's weight around - 20/11/2010 10:54:59 PM 942 Views
plot convenience, then. - 21/11/2010 12:54:51 AM 976 Views
I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:36:44 PM 919 Views
Re: I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:49:09 PM 999 Views
not necessarily - 21/11/2010 02:42:51 AM 1006 Views
in fact it's likely why it is flawed - 21/11/2010 02:45:31 AM 986 Views
Callandor Creation - 21/11/2010 03:36:18 AM 1421 Views
there wasn't a single woman who would help him *NM* - 21/11/2010 12:49:23 AM 394 Views
This. *NM* - 21/11/2010 01:04:30 AM 390 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:12:13 AM 915 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:14:46 AM 974 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:27:33 AM 878 Views
I' say wait and see.... - 21/11/2010 06:46:01 PM 1059 Views
this brings up some interesting points - 23/11/2010 12:46:28 AM 1119 Views

Reply to Message