Active Users:475 Time:14/12/2025 10:53:31 PM
Why was Callandor not considered? Knightscape Send a noteboard - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM

In this point in time it looks more and more likely that Callandor is being considered the key to re-sealing the bore, which begs the question of why it was not being considered in the Age Of Legends.

The men of the time favored using seals which ultimately led to the taint and the breaking of the world. The women favored using the Choedan Kal, which if used against the DO would have meant the destruction of creation, but was ultimately needed for the cleansing of the taint. This seems to be a perfect example of the workings of the Pattern. Now with that being said why didn't the pattern just push LTT to use Callandor to re-seal the bore in the first place?
All good things come to those who wait.
Reply to message
Why was Callandor not considered? - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM 1365 Views
seems like a question of fate vs. free will - 20/11/2010 10:40:51 PM 923 Views
The pattern quite clearly does like throwing it's weight around - 20/11/2010 10:54:59 PM 834 Views
plot convenience, then. - 21/11/2010 12:54:51 AM 907 Views
I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:36:44 PM 852 Views
Re: I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:49:09 PM 932 Views
not necessarily - 21/11/2010 02:42:51 AM 912 Views
in fact it's likely why it is flawed - 21/11/2010 02:45:31 AM 881 Views
Callandor Creation - 21/11/2010 03:36:18 AM 1311 Views
there wasn't a single woman who would help him *NM* - 21/11/2010 12:49:23 AM 363 Views
This. *NM* - 21/11/2010 01:04:30 AM 346 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:12:13 AM 842 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:14:46 AM 859 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:27:33 AM 807 Views
I' say wait and see.... - 21/11/2010 06:46:01 PM 983 Views
this brings up some interesting points - 23/11/2010 12:46:28 AM 1041 Views

Reply to Message