Active Users:479 Time:02/05/2025 01:56:43 PM
Why was Callandor not considered? Knightscape Send a noteboard - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM

In this point in time it looks more and more likely that Callandor is being considered the key to re-sealing the bore, which begs the question of why it was not being considered in the Age Of Legends.

The men of the time favored using seals which ultimately led to the taint and the breaking of the world. The women favored using the Choedan Kal, which if used against the DO would have meant the destruction of creation, but was ultimately needed for the cleansing of the taint. This seems to be a perfect example of the workings of the Pattern. Now with that being said why didn't the pattern just push LTT to use Callandor to re-seal the bore in the first place?
All good things come to those who wait.
Reply to message
Why was Callandor not considered? - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM 1281 Views
seems like a question of fate vs. free will - 20/11/2010 10:40:51 PM 839 Views
The pattern quite clearly does like throwing it's weight around - 20/11/2010 10:54:59 PM 761 Views
plot convenience, then. - 21/11/2010 12:54:51 AM 772 Views
I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:36:44 PM 766 Views
Re: I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:49:09 PM 845 Views
not necessarily - 21/11/2010 02:42:51 AM 815 Views
in fact it's likely why it is flawed - 21/11/2010 02:45:31 AM 801 Views
Callandor Creation - 21/11/2010 03:36:18 AM 1209 Views
there wasn't a single woman who would help him *NM* - 21/11/2010 12:49:23 AM 320 Views
This. *NM* - 21/11/2010 01:04:30 AM 295 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:12:13 AM 757 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:14:46 AM 760 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:27:33 AM 722 Views
I' say wait and see.... - 21/11/2010 06:46:01 PM 872 Views
this brings up some interesting points - 23/11/2010 12:46:28 AM 860 Views

Reply to Message