Active Users:2117 Time:18/06/2026 12:51:52 PM
Why was Callandor not considered? Knightscape Send a noteboard - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM

In this point in time it looks more and more likely that Callandor is being considered the key to re-sealing the bore, which begs the question of why it was not being considered in the Age Of Legends.

The men of the time favored using seals which ultimately led to the taint and the breaking of the world. The women favored using the Choedan Kal, which if used against the DO would have meant the destruction of creation, but was ultimately needed for the cleansing of the taint. This seems to be a perfect example of the workings of the Pattern. Now with that being said why didn't the pattern just push LTT to use Callandor to re-seal the bore in the first place?
All good things come to those who wait.
Reply to message
Why was Callandor not considered? - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM 1504 Views
seems like a question of fate vs. free will - 20/11/2010 10:40:51 PM 1069 Views
The pattern quite clearly does like throwing it's weight around - 20/11/2010 10:54:59 PM 976 Views
plot convenience, then. - 21/11/2010 12:54:51 AM 1009 Views
I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:36:44 PM 944 Views
Re: I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:49:09 PM 1032 Views
not necessarily - 21/11/2010 02:42:51 AM 1036 Views
in fact it's likely why it is flawed - 21/11/2010 02:45:31 AM 1012 Views
Callandor Creation - 21/11/2010 03:36:18 AM 1460 Views
there wasn't a single woman who would help him *NM* - 21/11/2010 12:49:23 AM 406 Views
This. *NM* - 21/11/2010 01:04:30 AM 404 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:12:13 AM 944 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:14:46 AM 1002 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:27:33 AM 903 Views
I' say wait and see.... - 21/11/2010 06:46:01 PM 1084 Views
this brings up some interesting points - 23/11/2010 12:46:28 AM 1146 Views

Reply to Message