Active Users:429 Time:17/09/2025 12:31:02 PM
Why was Callandor not considered? Knightscape Send a noteboard - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM

In this point in time it looks more and more likely that Callandor is being considered the key to re-sealing the bore, which begs the question of why it was not being considered in the Age Of Legends.

The men of the time favored using seals which ultimately led to the taint and the breaking of the world. The women favored using the Choedan Kal, which if used against the DO would have meant the destruction of creation, but was ultimately needed for the cleansing of the taint. This seems to be a perfect example of the workings of the Pattern. Now with that being said why didn't the pattern just push LTT to use Callandor to re-seal the bore in the first place?
All good things come to those who wait.
Reply to message
Why was Callandor not considered? - 20/11/2010 10:29:26 PM 1332 Views
seems like a question of fate vs. free will - 20/11/2010 10:40:51 PM 894 Views
The pattern quite clearly does like throwing it's weight around - 20/11/2010 10:54:59 PM 804 Views
plot convenience, then. - 21/11/2010 12:54:51 AM 871 Views
I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:36:44 PM 817 Views
Re: I don't believe Callandor existed during the War of Power - 20/11/2010 11:49:09 PM 903 Views
not necessarily - 21/11/2010 02:42:51 AM 870 Views
in fact it's likely why it is flawed - 21/11/2010 02:45:31 AM 850 Views
Callandor Creation - 21/11/2010 03:36:18 AM 1265 Views
there wasn't a single woman who would help him *NM* - 21/11/2010 12:49:23 AM 346 Views
This. *NM* - 21/11/2010 01:04:30 AM 320 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:12:13 AM 810 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:14:46 AM 818 Views
Re: there wasn't a single woman who would help him - 21/11/2010 02:27:33 AM 775 Views
I' say wait and see.... - 21/11/2010 06:46:01 PM 932 Views
this brings up some interesting points - 23/11/2010 12:46:28 AM 973 Views

Reply to Message