Active Users:2152 Time:18/06/2026 03:29:00 AM
ta'veren is old tongue for "main character" you know.... moondog Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:32:29 AM
Sure, the book had faults, but really, I didn't expect this level of fanboy-rage. Haters gonna hate I guess.

If I could choose things to be done differently, it would be Graendal's survival (that WAS poor writing) and Mat's letter. But these minor points aside, I found the rest of the book to be pretty good in general. It didn't have the oomph of TGS, but I never expected it to, since it followed Mat and Perrin, who are ultimately supporting characters.


they're more main characters than the real main character, rand al'thor. especially in the last two books.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 29/11/2010 10:40:47 AM 2425 Views
I love Ituralde, slightly A-teamish but better more realistic than most of the stuff in there *NM* - 29/11/2010 03:15:03 PM 721 Views
I agree here. - 29/11/2010 04:23:37 PM 1465 Views
and it is still realistic. After all, Luck is part of reality *nod* *NM* - 29/11/2010 05:16:39 PM 634 Views
Agreed - 30/11/2010 12:50:35 AM 1442 Views
Oh, I loved the scene with Perrin's Hammar - 29/11/2010 05:15:48 PM 1773 Views
Mats letter +1. Then the others... - 29/11/2010 06:00:59 PM 1631 Views
Healing the madness makes sense - 30/11/2010 03:51:35 AM 1408 Views
Mat's poor writing skills actually make sense - 29/11/2010 06:57:38 PM 1636 Views
I always imagined he'd have better spelling skills, though. - 29/11/2010 07:09:20 PM 1351 Views
he does. *NM* - 29/11/2010 09:25:19 PM 668 Views
this is wrong (from canon) - 29/11/2010 09:24:35 PM 1555 Views
bunch of geeks take this too serious :p - 30/11/2010 12:07:38 AM 1346 Views
Given how poorly edited both books have been so far - 30/11/2010 01:13:58 AM 1451 Views
Yes - 30/11/2010 02:02:28 AM 1531 Views
Re: this is wrong (from canon) - 30/11/2010 04:18:14 PM 1463 Views
nah - 30/11/2010 04:28:53 PM 1463 Views
I disagree... - 01/12/2010 05:20:37 PM 1224 Views
I liked it - 30/11/2010 12:55:41 AM 1245 Views
Re: Mat's poor writing skills actually make sense - 30/11/2010 11:11:50 AM 1264 Views
That is what made me think Mat wrote the letter that way on purpose. - 30/11/2010 01:57:26 PM 1524 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 29/11/2010 11:41:48 PM 1445 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? ...Just one... - 30/11/2010 12:36:05 AM 1351 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:03:09 AM 1541 Views
Re: Ituralde - 30/11/2010 03:57:55 AM 1435 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:12:11 AM 1505 Views
Worst part of reading the book was logging on here afterwards. - 30/11/2010 03:44:50 AM 1560 Views
ta'veren is old tongue for "main character" you know.... - 30/11/2010 04:32:29 AM 1699 Views
plainly you are a Blasphemer and Great Traitor. - 30/11/2010 11:51:07 AM 1390 Views
"We're done, al'Thor. From now on, I care nothing for you." - 30/11/2010 04:44:16 AM 1401 Views
I became stupider having read that monologue. *NM* - 02/12/2010 05:17:31 AM 781 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:09:32 PM 1343 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 01/12/2010 02:31:32 PM 1368 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 02/12/2010 08:17:40 AM 1345 Views
My argument is probably not valid, but I'll give it anyway - 02/12/2010 05:13:58 PM 1295 Views

Reply to Message