Active Users:188 Time:18/05/2024 06:35:37 PM
ta'veren is old tongue for "main character" you know.... moondog Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:32:29 AM
Sure, the book had faults, but really, I didn't expect this level of fanboy-rage. Haters gonna hate I guess.

If I could choose things to be done differently, it would be Graendal's survival (that WAS poor writing) and Mat's letter. But these minor points aside, I found the rest of the book to be pretty good in general. It didn't have the oomph of TGS, but I never expected it to, since it followed Mat and Perrin, who are ultimately supporting characters.


they're more main characters than the real main character, rand al'thor. especially in the last two books.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 29/11/2010 10:40:47 AM 1977 Views
I love Ituralde, slightly A-teamish but better more realistic than most of the stuff in there *NM* - 29/11/2010 03:15:03 PM 518 Views
I agree here. - 29/11/2010 04:23:37 PM 1022 Views
and it is still realistic. After all, Luck is part of reality *nod* *NM* - 29/11/2010 05:16:39 PM 413 Views
Agreed - 30/11/2010 12:50:35 AM 1014 Views
Oh, I loved the scene with Perrin's Hammar - 29/11/2010 05:15:48 PM 1282 Views
Mats letter +1. Then the others... - 29/11/2010 06:00:59 PM 1199 Views
Healing the madness makes sense - 30/11/2010 03:51:35 AM 940 Views
Mat's poor writing skills actually make sense - 29/11/2010 06:57:38 PM 1145 Views
I always imagined he'd have better spelling skills, though. - 29/11/2010 07:09:20 PM 941 Views
he does. *NM* - 29/11/2010 09:25:19 PM 437 Views
this is wrong (from canon) - 29/11/2010 09:24:35 PM 1103 Views
bunch of geeks take this too serious :p - 30/11/2010 12:07:38 AM 898 Views
Given how poorly edited both books have been so far - 30/11/2010 01:13:58 AM 993 Views
Yes - 30/11/2010 02:02:28 AM 1054 Views
Re: this is wrong (from canon) - 30/11/2010 04:18:14 PM 1033 Views
nah - 30/11/2010 04:28:53 PM 1026 Views
I liked it - 30/11/2010 12:55:41 AM 831 Views
Re: Mat's poor writing skills actually make sense - 30/11/2010 11:11:50 AM 805 Views
That is what made me think Mat wrote the letter that way on purpose. - 30/11/2010 01:57:26 PM 1038 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 29/11/2010 11:41:48 PM 1011 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? ...Just one... - 30/11/2010 12:36:05 AM 892 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:03:09 AM 1069 Views
Re: Ituralde - 30/11/2010 03:57:55 AM 997 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:12:11 AM 1062 Views
Worst part of reading the book was logging on here afterwards. - 30/11/2010 03:44:50 AM 1105 Views
ta'veren is old tongue for "main character" you know.... - 30/11/2010 04:32:29 AM 1184 Views
plainly you are a Blasphemer and Great Traitor. - 30/11/2010 11:51:07 AM 912 Views
"We're done, al'Thor. From now on, I care nothing for you." - 30/11/2010 04:44:16 AM 958 Views
I became stupider having read that monologue. *NM* - 02/12/2010 05:17:31 AM 571 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 30/11/2010 02:09:32 PM 875 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 01/12/2010 02:31:32 PM 876 Views
Re: So what were your bottom five ToM scenes? - 02/12/2010 08:17:40 AM 875 Views
My argument is probably not valid, but I'll give it anyway - 02/12/2010 05:13:58 PM 858 Views

Reply to Message