Active Users:742 Time:16/03/2026 08:54:21 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
for the large part, RJ's nobles weren't particularly deep either. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 08:15:07 PM
I didn't find BS's characterization of the nobles less fleshed out than RJ's nobles of similar narrative status. Sure, RJ fleshed out some of the "big" nobles, like the ones who went into direct conflict with Rand, or who became Rand's stewards...but he didn't really flesh out most of the other nobles. I don't think the nobles we see in ToM serve any real purpose beyond as a narrative tool, and I don't think that RJ would have fleshed them out much more than BS did, if at all.

Content Edit: As a secondary thought, RJ might have fleshed them out more if he was using his usual deliberate plodding pace and had spent more time on this plot line than BS does. However, I really don't think any of us would have wanted to read that particular plot line drawn out to that level ;)
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 30/11/2010 at 08:17:06 PM
Reply to message
Brilliant my ass guttering flame - 30/11/2010 07:08:46 PM 1674 Views
Nobles are interchangeable.... Insomdeon - 30/11/2010 07:32:50 PM 1095 Views
for the large part, RJ's nobles weren't particularly deep either. LadyLorraine - 30/11/2010 08:15:07 PM 1053 Views
Re: Brilliant my ass Lo'oris - 30/11/2010 10:31:24 PM 1005 Views
So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death? guttering flame - 01/12/2010 11:02:18 AM 994 Views
Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death? Lo'oris - 01/12/2010 11:05:37 AM 907 Views
Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death? HyogaRott - 02/12/2010 03:25:28 PM 909 Views
I really do not see how being given new lands and a new chance is "worse than death". LadyLorraine - 02/12/2010 04:13:53 PM 958 Views
Re: Brilliant my ass Zeratul - 01/12/2010 12:57:34 AM 968 Views
Interesting guttering flame - 01/12/2010 11:04:26 AM 873 Views
Re: Interesting Lo'oris - 01/12/2010 11:07:02 AM 873 Views
Notice how people liked Henry VIII more than they liked Henry VII guttering flame - 01/12/2010 11:15:03 AM 867 Views
because of his "Kingly" behavior, in comparison to VII's lack thereof. LadyLorraine - 01/12/2010 08:26:26 PM 932 Views
I think you're making my point for me guttering flame - 02/12/2010 06:34:17 AM 853 Views
Re: I think you're making my point for me Lo'oris - 02/12/2010 08:09:33 AM 871 Views
Re: I think you're making my point for me guttering flame - 02/12/2010 11:41:28 AM 932 Views
Re: I think you're making my point for me Lo'oris - 02/12/2010 11:47:11 AM 851 Views
it only appears that way if you look at only those two kings. LadyLorraine - 02/12/2010 02:23:03 PM 889 Views
exactly ^^ *NM* Lo'oris - 02/12/2010 02:30:59 PM 462 Views
wasnt king henry VIII really fat, or was that another henry?*NM* *NM* RAAM - 02/12/2010 04:33:50 AM 481 Views
Henry VIII was certainly not a stick of a man *NM* guttering flame - 02/12/2010 06:36:08 AM 409 Views
He was not particularly fat until he was older. LadyLorraine - 02/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 911 Views
Henry VIII got an injury to his leg that never healed right. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2010 04:01:10 PM 1027 Views
yah, but you probably would become portly and mean-spirited too LadyLorraine - 02/12/2010 04:10:52 PM 868 Views
Re: Henry VIII got an injury to his leg that never healed right. Lo'oris - 02/12/2010 05:40:40 PM 850 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes