Active Users:2182 Time:01/05/2026 07:51:29 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
for the large part, RJ's nobles weren't particularly deep either. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 08:15:07 PM
I didn't find BS's characterization of the nobles less fleshed out than RJ's nobles of similar narrative status. Sure, RJ fleshed out some of the "big" nobles, like the ones who went into direct conflict with Rand, or who became Rand's stewards...but he didn't really flesh out most of the other nobles. I don't think the nobles we see in ToM serve any real purpose beyond as a narrative tool, and I don't think that RJ would have fleshed them out much more than BS did, if at all.

Content Edit: As a secondary thought, RJ might have fleshed them out more if he was using his usual deliberate plodding pace and had spent more time on this plot line than BS does. However, I really don't think any of us would have wanted to read that particular plot line drawn out to that level ;)
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 30/11/2010 at 08:17:06 PM
Reply to message
Brilliant my ass guttering flame - 30/11/2010 07:08:46 PM 1693 Views
Nobles are interchangeable.... Insomdeon - 30/11/2010 07:32:50 PM 1118 Views
for the large part, RJ's nobles weren't particularly deep either. LadyLorraine - 30/11/2010 08:15:07 PM 1070 Views
Re: Brilliant my ass Lo'oris - 30/11/2010 10:31:24 PM 1021 Views
So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death? guttering flame - 01/12/2010 11:02:18 AM 1013 Views
Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death? Lo'oris - 01/12/2010 11:05:37 AM 926 Views
Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death? HyogaRott - 02/12/2010 03:25:28 PM 929 Views
I really do not see how being given new lands and a new chance is "worse than death". LadyLorraine - 02/12/2010 04:13:53 PM 976 Views
Re: Brilliant my ass Zeratul - 01/12/2010 12:57:34 AM 982 Views
Interesting guttering flame - 01/12/2010 11:04:26 AM 894 Views
Re: Interesting Lo'oris - 01/12/2010 11:07:02 AM 892 Views
Notice how people liked Henry VIII more than they liked Henry VII guttering flame - 01/12/2010 11:15:03 AM 888 Views
because of his "Kingly" behavior, in comparison to VII's lack thereof. LadyLorraine - 01/12/2010 08:26:26 PM 955 Views
I think you're making my point for me guttering flame - 02/12/2010 06:34:17 AM 870 Views
Re: I think you're making my point for me Lo'oris - 02/12/2010 08:09:33 AM 890 Views
Re: I think you're making my point for me guttering flame - 02/12/2010 11:41:28 AM 953 Views
Re: I think you're making my point for me Lo'oris - 02/12/2010 11:47:11 AM 873 Views
it only appears that way if you look at only those two kings. LadyLorraine - 02/12/2010 02:23:03 PM 905 Views
exactly ^^ *NM* Lo'oris - 02/12/2010 02:30:59 PM 470 Views
wasnt king henry VIII really fat, or was that another henry?*NM* *NM* RAAM - 02/12/2010 04:33:50 AM 491 Views
Henry VIII was certainly not a stick of a man *NM* guttering flame - 02/12/2010 06:36:08 AM 421 Views
He was not particularly fat until he was older. LadyLorraine - 02/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 928 Views
Henry VIII got an injury to his leg that never healed right. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2010 04:01:10 PM 1050 Views
yah, but you probably would become portly and mean-spirited too LadyLorraine - 02/12/2010 04:10:52 PM 886 Views
Re: Henry VIII got an injury to his leg that never healed right. Lo'oris - 02/12/2010 05:40:40 PM 872 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes