Active Users:729 Time:18/12/2025 07:11:24 AM
I agree with you. Hopefully Post LB there will be a new structure to the AS organization darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 07/12/2010 05:34:01 PM
Egwene wants to reform the WT and forge these alliances. I started out as an AS fan, but towards the end, I really wanted the Wondergirls to start something new.


At the very least with on ongoing threat from the Seanchan I can see the AS, Asha'man, WO and WF allying just to stay free of the leash!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 03:12:00 PM 1937 Views
Re: Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 03:22:49 PM 1149 Views
Re: Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 10:44:01 PM 917 Views
*shrugs* ... the oaths are lame and so full of holes the only value they bring is - 07/12/2010 03:26:21 PM 913 Views
I wonder what would have happened if she refused and left the tower entirely. - 07/12/2010 03:30:58 PM 905 Views
I doubt they would have stopped her ... but there was no real reason for her to refuse the - 07/12/2010 03:34:20 PM 876 Views
no there wasn't a real reason for her to refuse. It'd still be interesting if she did *NM* - 07/12/2010 03:37:45 PM 428 Views
would have made for an interesting spin on the plot - 07/12/2010 05:37:31 PM 885 Views
How is she not a lead? - 07/12/2010 06:25:45 PM 831 Views
She has never really had her own unique plot line - 07/12/2010 06:34:40 PM 819 Views
I'm going to have to disagree with you on that - 07/12/2010 07:46:08 PM 858 Views
Nothing to really argue here except perspective ... to each their own *NM* - 07/12/2010 10:26:04 PM 416 Views
Re: *shrugs* ... the oaths are lame and so full of holes the only value they bring is - 07/12/2010 10:49:12 PM 894 Views
I think that is true of the testing not the Oaths - 08/12/2010 05:08:22 PM 824 Views
she shouldn't have, although I think they should trash the oaths in general - 07/12/2010 03:29:21 PM 828 Views
agreed! and I think Nynaeve's testing rather proved that point - 07/12/2010 03:35:38 PM 901 Views
Especially since Egwene herself didn't really think it necessary for herself to take the tests - 07/12/2010 03:43:18 PM 870 Views
well it looks like such a coalition is part of the plan - 07/12/2010 03:47:03 PM 859 Views
I meant one that would destroy the White Tower - 07/12/2010 03:53:35 PM 935 Views
ahh I see. well maybe they shall - 07/12/2010 04:00:52 PM 822 Views
I agree with you. Hopefully Post LB there will be a new structure to the AS organization - 07/12/2010 05:34:01 PM 792 Views
She was always going to have to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 04:42:59 PM 851 Views
Good old political necessity - 07/12/2010 06:29:26 PM 751 Views
Amyrlin's decree - 07/12/2010 09:56:51 PM 832 Views
Brace yourselves, everybody... - 08/12/2010 02:56:43 PM 782 Views
Ooops, double post! *NM* - 08/12/2010 02:58:01 PM 423 Views
And what? To miss all the awesomeness she had before/during/after the test? - 07/12/2010 06:27:23 PM 808 Views
I agree about the test, kind of. The Oaths was going too far. - 07/12/2010 07:02:43 PM 977 Views
Re: I agree about the test, kind of. The Oaths was going too far. - 16/12/2010 10:40:39 AM 716 Views
And yet people keep choosing donuts over lettuce *NM* - 16/12/2010 10:47:04 AM 443 Views
It's supposed to be a required part of being Aes Sedai. - 08/12/2010 08:52:34 AM 806 Views
Has Egwene swore the Oaths? - 08/12/2010 03:11:37 PM 891 Views
Yes - she swore on the Oath Rod in TGS. *NM* - 08/12/2010 03:22:31 PM 468 Views
Love Nynaeve... - 10/12/2010 09:49:13 AM 786 Views
On the contrary, being Aes Sedai means she had to swear the Oaths. - 14/12/2010 04:53:28 AM 760 Views
Re: On the contrary, being Aes Sedai means she had to swear the Oaths. - 14/12/2010 11:53:43 AM 849 Views
Passing your scars on - 14/12/2010 07:07:43 PM 693 Views
Re: Passing your scars on - 14/12/2010 10:45:01 PM 872 Views
Actually I'm not being flippant - 15/12/2010 05:58:22 AM 787 Views
So? - 15/12/2010 11:40:32 AM 846 Views

Reply to Message