Active Users:349 Time:17/06/2025 10:56:00 AM
Elaida / Siuan versus Morgase springs to mind ajfurst Send a noteboard - 16/12/2010 07:00:21 AM
Gareth Bryne was forced to stop attacking Murandy as Elaida and Siuan thought that'd be better for the world, even though it wasn't great for Andor.

Andor's lords should all get together in front of Elayne and ask her one question once she's sworn on the oath rod. "If the Amyrlin asks you to do something not in the best interests of Andor, will you refuse?". If she can't/won't straight out say yes, they should remove her as Queen. Simple as that.
Reply to message
Elayne kissing Egwene's ring? - 15/12/2010 09:11:34 PM 1650 Views
Hm. Lord Agalmar was pretty subsevient to the Amyrlin in tGH. - 15/12/2010 09:39:21 PM 1173 Views
Borderlanders have great respect for Aes Sedai - 15/12/2010 09:50:25 PM 911 Views
The Amyrlin Seat is considered to rank above a monarch. - 15/12/2010 10:09:39 PM 1034 Views
It's a mere mark of respect to the Amyrlin Seat (the position, not the woman) - 16/12/2010 02:01:17 AM 1078 Views
Interesting points - 16/12/2010 10:41:52 AM 884 Views
Re: Interesting points - 16/12/2010 01:57:56 PM 856 Views
I disliked her actions - 16/12/2010 03:46:44 PM 809 Views
This deserves its own thread.. - 16/12/2010 08:51:05 PM 950 Views
Re: This deserves its own thread.. - 17/12/2010 02:30:21 PM 1035 Views
Re: This deserves its own thread.. - 17/12/2010 04:46:28 PM 799 Views
Nice catch!! - 17/12/2010 07:09:43 PM 840 Views
Yep, unsustainable conflict of interest here. - 18/12/2010 05:44:38 AM 831 Views
I think we largely agree, but... - 17/12/2010 06:59:46 PM 842 Views
Elaida / Siuan versus Morgase springs to mind - 16/12/2010 07:00:21 AM 1020 Views
Re: Elaida / Siuan versus Morgase springs to mind - 16/12/2010 07:56:41 PM 922 Views
yes, because that question is totally a yes/no question - 16/12/2010 11:49:34 PM 845 Views
What's simplicity got to do with it? - 17/12/2010 01:19:12 AM 781 Views
The Nobles don't really have any reason to assume the Amyrlin would do that - 20/12/2010 08:50:54 PM 823 Views

Reply to Message