Active Users:1012 Time:31/07/2026 04:38:33 AM
Er no Ben Send a noteboard - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM
1. New Super Rand can't be harmed by the tower anymore. The pattern wont allow him to be captured or injured by them.
2. Assuming Eggy could overpower him and tries to beat him to show him who's boss then Aliva, Nyn, Caddy and whichever Ashaman Rand has with him will kick off. Probably with Perrins channelers forming circles too. This would lead to the destruction of nearly the whole of the light side as they battle each other. Not even Egwene is stupid enough to try and use force here.
3. Rand will most likely break the seals either before the talks start or right as they start. So that he can say, "right now that's done we can discuss what I wanted you all here to discuss". Basically his price of peace for him fighting the DO at SG.
4. I think those viewings have all been done now. The only other female who can channel who could harm Rand would be Cyndane. And there is still a fair chance of that.

Ben

PS Eggy's attitude needs sorting out mind. Wouldn't it be fun if one of the conditions of The Dragon's Peace is for Eggy (and by extension the tower) to kneel to the world's rulers to show the AS are the Servant of All and not the supreme power in the world.
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 2141 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 611 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1227 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 1082 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 884 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 980 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 893 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 1153 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 1017 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1265 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 469 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 1117 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 966 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 968 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 954 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 984 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 1064 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 916 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 997 Views

Reply to Message